ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Explicit multicasting for mobile ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (244 KB)
Source Mobile Networks and Applications archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 5  (October 2003) table of contents
Pages: 535 - 549  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1383-469X
Authors
Lusheng Ji  Fujitsu Laboratories of America, 8400 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 302, College Park, MD
M. Scott Corson  Flarion Technologies Inc., Bedminster One, Bedminster, NJ
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers  Hingham, MA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1023/A:1025189828172

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose an explicit multicast routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Explicit multicasting differs from common approaches by listing destination addresses in data packet headers. Using the explicit destination information, the multicast routing protocol can avoid the overhead of employing its own route construction and maintenance mechanisms by taking advantage of unicast routing table. Our protocol - termed Differential Destination Multicast (DDM) - is an explicit multicast routing protocol specifically designed for MANET environment. Unlike other MANET multicasting protocols, instead of distributing membership control throughout the network, DDM concentrates this authority at the data sources (i.e. senders) thereby giving sources knowledge of group membership. In addition, differentially-encoded, variable-length destination headers are inserted in data packets which are used in combination with unicast routing tables to forward multicast packets towards multicast receivers. Instead of requiring that multicast forwarding state to be stored in all participating nodes, this approach also provides the option of stateless multicasting. Each node independently has the choice of caching forwarding state or having its upstream neighbor to insert this state into self-routed data packets, or some combination thereof. The protocol is best suited for use with small multicast groups operating in dynamic MANET environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
{1} E. Bommaiah, A. McAuley and R. Talpade, Amroute: ad hoc multicast routing protocol, Internet Draft, draft-talpade-manet-amroute-00.txt (February 1999), work in progress.
 
2
{2} R. Boivie, A new multicast scheme for small groups, IBM Research Report RC21512(97046) (June 1999).
3
4
 
5
{5} J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves and E. Madruga, A multicast routing protocol for ad-hoc networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'99 (March 1999) pp. 784-792.
 
6
{6} J. Jercheva, Y. Hu, D. Maltz and D. Johnson, A simple protocol for multicast and broadcast in mobile ad hoc networks, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-simple-mbcast-01.txt (July 2002), work in progress.
 
7
{7} L. Ji and M. Corson, Light-weight adaptive multicast, in: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM'98 (November 1998).
 
8
{8} L. Ji and M. Corson, Differential destination multicast (ddm) specification, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-ddm-00.txt (July 2000), work in progress.
 
9
{9} L. Ji and M. Corson, Differential destination multicast - a manet multicast routing protocol for small groups, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001 (April 2001).
 
10
{10} D. Johnson and D. Maltz, Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks, in: Mobile Computing, eds. T. Imielinski and H. Korth (1996) pp. 153-181.
 
11
{11} S. Lee, W. Su and M. Gerla, On-demand multicast routing protocol (ODMRP), Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-odmrp-02.txt (June 1999), work in progress.
 
12
{12} S. Lee, W. Su, J. Hsu, M. Gerla and R. Bagrodia, A performance comparison study of ad hoc wireless multicast protocols, in: INFOCOM 2000 (March 2000).
 
13
{13} D. Ooms and W. Livens, Connectionless multicast, Internet Draft, draft-ooms-cl-multicast-01.txt (October 1999), work in progress.
 
14
{14} T. Ozaki, J. Kim and T. Suda, Bandwidth-efficient multicast routing protocol for ad hoc networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE ICCCN'99 (October 1999).
15
 
16
{16} C. Perkins, E. Royer and S. Das, Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-04. txt (October 1999), work in progress.
17
 
18
{18} P. Sinha, R. Sivakumar and V. Bharghavan, Mcedar: Multicast core extraction distributed ad hoc routing, in: Proceedings of IEEE WCNC'99 (September 1999).
 
19
{19} I. Stoica, T. Ng and H. Zhang, Reunite: A recursive unicast approach to multicast, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'00 (March 2000).
 
20
{20} UC Berkeley and LBL and USC/ISI and Xerox PARC, ns notes and documentation, http://www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns (October 1999).
 
21
{21} C. Wu, Y. Tay and C. Toh, Ad hoc multicast routing protocol utilizing increasing id-numbers (amris) functional specification, Intenet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-amris-spec-00.txt (November 1998).



REVIEW

"Mariusz A. Fecko : Reviewer"

An explicit multicast routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) is presented in this paper. Unlike the traditional multicast protocols, this approach moves multicasting out of the routing layer, so that multicasting no longer requires r  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lusheng Ji: colleagues
M. Scott Corson: colleagues