Comparing representations with relational and EER models

ABSTRACT

The diffusion of technology to end users who can now develop their own information systems raises issues concerning the cost, quality, efficiency, and accuracy of such systems.

REFERENCES

• 1: D. Batra , J. G. Davis, A study of conceptual data modeling in database design: similarities and differences between expert and novice designers, Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information Systems, p.91-99, December 1989, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/75034.75043]
• 2: Benjamin, R.I. Information technology in the 1990's: A long range planning scenario. MIS Q. (June 1982), vol. 6, 2 11-32
• 3: Michael R. Blaha , William J. Premerlani , James E. Rumbaugh, Relational database design using an object-oriented methodology, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.4, p.414-427, April 1988 [doi>10.1145/42404.42407]
• 4: Brodie, M.L. On the development of data models. In M.L. Brodie et al., Eds., On Conceptual Modelling. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
• 5: Brosey, M., and Shneiderman, B. Two experimenta} comparisons of relational and hierarchical database models. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 10, (1978), 625-637.
• 6: Peter Pin-Shan Chen, The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.1 n.1, p.9-36, March 1976 [doi>10.1145/320434.320440]
• 7: CODASYL Data Base Task Group, April 1971 Report, ACM, New York.
• 8: E. F. Codd, A relational model of data for large shared data banks, Communications of the ACM, v.13 n.6, p.377-387, June 1970 [doi>10.1145/362384.362685]
• 9: Codd, E.F. A data base sublanguage founded on the relational calculus. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGFIDET Workshop o~ Data Description, Access and Control (Nov. 1971), pp. 35-68.
• 10: C.J. Date, An Introduction to Database Systems, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2003
• 11: Davis, F.D. A technology acceptance model for emFirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management. 1985.
• 12: Davis, J.G. A typology of management information systems users and its implications for effectiveness research. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Business 1986.
• 13: Davis, J.G., and Srinivasan, A. Incorporating user diversity into information systems assessment. In Information Systems Assessment, North-Holland. 1988, 83-100.
• 14: Durding, B.M., Becker, C.A., and Gould, J.D. Data organization. Human Factors 19, 1 (Feb. 1977), 1-14.
• 15: R. Elmasri , J. Weeldreyer , A. Hevner, The category concept: an extension to the entity-relationship model, Data & Knowledge Engineering, v.1 n.1, p.75-116, April 1985 [doi>10.1016/0169-023X(85)90027-8]
• 16: Fromkin, H.L., and Streufert, S. Laboratory experimentation. In M.D. Dunnette, Ed., Handbook of Industrial Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1976, 415-465.
• 17: Michael Hammer , Dennis Mc Leod, Database description with SDM: a semantic database model, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.6 n.3, p.351-386, Sept. 1981 [doi>10.1145/319587.319588]
• 18: Hoffer, J.A. An empirical investigation into individua~ differences in database models. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Systems. (Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 13-16, 1982), pp. 153-168.
• 19: Richard Hull , Roger King, Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.19 n.3, p.201-260, Sept. 1987 [doi>10.1145/45072.45073]
• 20: Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., and Norman, D.A. Direct Manipulation Interfaces. Human Comp. Interact. 1 (1985), 311-338.
• 21: IBM information management system/virtual storage (JAILS/VS), General Information manual. GH20-1260-3, IBM Corporation, White Plains, NY, 1975.
• 22: Jenkins, A.M. MIS Decision Variables and Decision Making Performance. UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1982.
• 23: Juhn, S., and Naumann, J.D. The effectiveness of data representation characteristics on user validation. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems (Indianapolis, Ind., 1985), pp. 212-226.
• 24: William Kent, Limitations of record-based information models, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.4 n.1, p.107-131, March 1979 [doi>10.1145/320064.320070]
• 25: F. H. Lochovsky , D. C. Tsichritzis, User performance considerations in DBMS selection, Proceedings of the 1977 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, August 03-05, 1977, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/509404.509425]
• 26: Fred R. McFadden , Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Modern database management (4th ed.), Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1994
• 27: McGrath, J.E. Towards a "Theory of Method" for research on organizations. In R.T. Mowday, et al., Eds., Research in Organizations: Issues and Controversies, Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, Cal., 1979.
• 28: McLean, E.R. End users as applications developers. MIS Q. (Dec. 1979), 37-46.
• 29: Nijssen G.M. An architecture for knowledge base ceedings of SPOT-2 Conference. (Stockholm, Sweden, Sept. 1981).
• 30: Norman, D.A. Forcing functions. Working Paper, University of California, San Diego, October 16, 1984.
• 31: Joan Peckham , Fred Maryanski, Semantic data models, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.20 n.3, p.153-189, Sept. 1988 [doi>10.1145/62061.62062]
• 32: Phyllis Reisner, Human Factors Studies of Database Query Languages: A Survey and Assessment, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.13 n.1, p.13-31, March 1981 [doi>10.1145/356835.356837]
• 33: Ridjanovic, D. Comparing quality of data representations produced by nonexperts using logical data structure and relational data models. Ph.D.dissertion, University of Minnesota, carlton school of Management 1986.
• 34: John F. Rockart , Lauren S. Flannery, The management of end user computing, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.10, p.776-784, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/358413.358429]
• 35: Hans Albrecht Schmid , J. Richard Swenson, On the semantics of the relational data model, Proceedings of the 1975 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, May 14-16, 1975, San Jose, California [doi>10.1145/500080.500110]
• 36: Peretz Shoval , Moshe Even-Chaime, Database schema design: an experimental comparison between normalization and information analysis, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.18 n.3, p.30-39, March 1987 [doi>10.1145/27544.27548]
• 37: John Miles Smith , Diane C. P. Smith, Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.2 n.2, p.105-133, June 1977 [doi>10.1145/320544.320546]
• 38: John Miles Smith , Diane C. P. Smith, Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.2 n.2, p.105-133, June 1977 [doi>10.1145/320544.320546]
• 39: Stone, E. Research Methods in Organization Behavior. Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, II1., 1978.
• 40: Toby J. Teorey , James P. Fry, Design of Database Structures, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1982
• 41: Toby J. Teorey , Dongqing Yang , James P. Fry, A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.18 n.2, p.197-222, June 1986 [doi>10.1145/7474.7475]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.1 Logical Design
          Subjects: Data models

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.3 Languages
          Subjects: Query languages

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Human Factors, Languages