ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Model-based inference of haplotype block variation
Full text PdfPdf (194 KB)
Source Annual Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology archive
Proceedings of the seventh annual international conference on Research in computational molecular biology table of contents
Berlin, Germany
Pages: 131 - 137  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-635-8
Authors
Gideon Greenspan  Technion, Technion City, Haifa, Israel
Dan Geiger  Technion, Technion City, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 832,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/640075.640092
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

The uneven recombination structure of human DNA has been highlighted by several recent studies. Knowledge of the haplotype blocks generated by this phenomenon can be applied to dramatically increase the statistical power of genetic mapping. Several criteria have already been proposed for identifying these blocks, all of which require haplotypes as input. We propose a comprehensive statistical model of haplotype block variation and show how the parameters of this model can be learned from haplotypes and/or unphased genotype data. Using real-world SNP data, we demonstrate that our approach can be used to resolve genotypes into their constituent haplotypes with greater accuracy than previously known methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Goldstein D. B. Islands of linkage disequilibrium. Nature Genetics, 29(2):109--11, 2001.
 
2
Jeffreys A. et al. Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex. Nature Genetics, 29(2):217--222, 2001.
 
3
Daly M. J. et al. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nature Genetics, 29(2):229--32, 2001.
 
4
Patil N. et al. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science, 294(5547):1719--23, 2001.
 
5
Gabriel S. B. et al. The Structure of Haplotype Blocks in the Human Genome. Science, 296(5576):2225--9, 2002.
 
6
Zhang K. et al. A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. PNAS USA, 99(11):7335--9, 2002.
 
7
Michalatos-Beloin S. et al. Molecular haplotyping of genetic markers 10 kb apart by allele-specific long-range PCR. Nucleic Acids Research, 24(23):4841--3, 1996.
 
8
Woolley A. T. et al. Direct haplotyping of kilobase-size DNA using carbon nanotube probes. Nature Biotechnology, 18(7):760--3, 2000.
 
9
Lizardi P. M. et al. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nature Genetics, 19(3):225--32, 1999.
 
10
Douglas J. A. et al. Experimentally-derived haplotypes substantially increase the efficiency of linkage disequilibrium studies. Nature Genetics, 28(4):361--4, 2001.
 
11
Clark A. G. Inference of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 7(2):111--22, 1990.
 
12
Gusfield D. Inference of haplotypes from samples of diploid populations: complexity and algorithms. Journal of Computational Biology, 8(3):305--23, 2001.
 
13
Excoffier L. & Slatkin M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12(5):921--7, 1995.
 
14
Long J. C. et al. An E-M algorithm and testing strategy for multiple-locus haplotypes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 56(3):799--810, 1995.
 
15
Templeton A. R. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. II. The analysis of natural populations. Genetics, 120:1145--1154, 1988.
 
16
Stephens M. et al. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68(4):978--89, 2001.
 
17
Niu T. et al. Bayesian haplotype inference for multiple linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70(1):157--69, 2002.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Dechter R. Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for probabilistic inference. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-96), pages 211--219, August 1--4 1996.
 
21
 
22
G. H. Hardy. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science, 18:49--50, 1908.
 
23
Templeton A. R. et al. Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene. American Journal of Human Genetics, 66(1):69--83, 2000.
 
24
Fullerton S. et al. Apolipoprotein E variation at the sequence haplotype level: implications for the origin and maintenance of a major human polymorphism. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(4):881--900, 2000.
 
25
Nachman M.W. & Crowell S.L. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics, 156(1):297--304, 2000.
 
26
Rissanen J. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465--471, 1978.
 
27
Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461--4, 1978.
 
28
Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27:379--423, 623--656, 1948.
 
29
Rissanen J. A universal prior for integers and estimation by minimum description length. Annals of Statistics, 11:416--431, 1983.
 
30
Ardlie K.G. et al. Patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(7):299--309, 2002.
 
31
Rieder M. J. et al. Sequence variation in the human angiotensin converting enzyme. Nature Genetics, 22(1):59--62, 1999.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gideon Greenspan: colleagues
Dan Geiger: colleagues