ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications
Full text HtmlHtml (39 KB),  PdfPdf (5.93 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 46 ,  Issue 3  (March 2003) table of contents
SPECIAL ISSUE: Attentive user interfaces table of contents
Pages: 52 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Eric Horvitz  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.
Carl Kadie  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.
Tim Paek  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.
David Hovel  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 84,   Downloads (12 Months): 307,   Citation Count: 44
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/636772.636798
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Creating computing and communication systems that sense and reason about human attention by fusing together information from multiple streams.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Clark, H.H. and Schaefer, E.F. Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes 2/1, (1987), 19--41.
 
2
Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proceedings of Interact 2001. IFIP. Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, July 2001.
 
3
Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., and Horvitz, E. Instant messaging: Effects of relevance and time. People and Computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI 2000. S. Turner, P. Turner, eds. British Computer Society (2000), 71--76.
 
4
Eriksen, C.W. and Yeh, Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985), 583--597.
 
5
Gillie, T. and Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychological Research 50 (1989), 243--250.
 
6
Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L. Plans for discourse. Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1990), 417--444.
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., and Hovel, D. Attention-sensitive alerting. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence. (Stockholm, Sweden, July 1999). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 305--313.
 
12
Horvitz, E., Koch, P., Kadie, C.M., and Jacobs, A. Coordinate: Probabilistic forecasting of presence and availability. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence. (Edmonton, Canada, July 2002) 224--233.

CITED BY  44

Collaborative Colleagues:
Eric Horvitz: colleagues
Carl Kadie: colleagues
Tim Paek: colleagues
David Hovel: colleagues