ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints
Full text PdfPdf (149 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1 table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Session 1B: bidding and bargaining agents I table of contents
Pages: 143 - 150  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-480-0
Authors
Shaheen S. Fatima  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K.
Michael Wooldridge  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K.
Nicholas R. Jennings  University of Southampton, Southampton, U.K.
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 68,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544741.544775
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new model for multi-issue negotiation under time constraints in an incomplete information setting. In this model the order in which issues are bargained over and agreements are reached is determined endogenously as part of the bargaining equilibrium. We show that the sequential implementation of the equilibrium agreement gives a better outcome than a simultaneous implementation when agents have like, as well as conflicting, time preferences. We also show that the equilibrium solution possesses the properties of uniqueness and symmetry, although it is not always Pareto-optimal.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Bac and H. Raff. Issue-by-issue negotiations: the role of information and time preference. Games and Economic Behavior, 13: 125--134, 1996.
 
2
P. Faratin, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(3--4): 159--182, 1998.
 
3
 
4
C. Fershtman. The importance of the agenda in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 2: 224--238, 1990.
 
5
R. Inderst. Multi-issue bargaining with endogenous agenda. Games and Economic Behavior, 30: 64--82, 2000.
 
6
R. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley, 1976.
 
7
 
8
M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, England, 1998.
9
 
10
D. G. Pruitt. Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, 1981.
 
11
H. Raiffa. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA, 1982.
 
12
A. Rubinstein. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50(1): 97--109, January 1982.
 
13
A. Rubinstein. A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences. Econometrica, 53: 1151--1172, January 1985.
 
14
 
15

CITED BY  17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shaheen S. Fatima: colleagues
Michael Wooldridge: colleagues
Nicholas R. Jennings: colleagues