ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site
Source IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence archive
Volume 22 ,  Issue 8  (August 2000) table of contents
Pages: 888 - 905  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:0162-8828
Authors
Jianbo Shi  Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Jitendra Malik  Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 397
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/34.868688

ABSTRACT

We propose a novel approach for solving the perceptual grouping problem in vision. Rather than focusing on local features and their consistencies in the image data, our approach aims at extracting the global impression of an image. We treat image segmentation as a graph partitioning problem and propose a novel global criterion, the normalized cut, for segmenting the graph. The normalized cut criterion measures both the total dissimilarity between the different groups as well as the total similarity within the groups. We show that an efficient computational technique based on a generalized eigenvalue problem can be used to optimize this criterion. We have applied this approach to segmenting static images, as well as motion sequences, and found the results to be very encouraging.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
R.B. Boppana, “Eigenvalues and Graph Bisection: An Average-Case Analysis,” <i>Proc. 28th Symp. Foundations of Computer Science,</i> pp. 280-285, 1987.
 
4
J. Cheeger, “A Lower Bound for the Smallest Eigenvalue of the Laplacian,” <i>Problems in Analysis,</i> R.C. Gunning, ed., pp. 195-199, Princeton Univ. Press, 1970.
 
5
F.R.K. Chung, <i>Spectral Graph Theory.</i> Am. Math. Soc., 1997.
 
6
I.J. Cox S.B. Rao and Y. Zhong, “Ratio Regions: A Technique for Image Segmentation,” <i>Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. Pattern Recognition,</i> 1996.
 
7
W.E. Donath and A.J. Hoffman, “Lower Bounds for the Partitioning of Graphs,” <i>IBM J. Research and Development,</i> pp. 420-425, 1973.
 
8
 
9
M. Fiedler, “A Property of Eigenvectors of Nonnegative Symmetric Matrices and Its Applications to Graph Theory,” <i>Czech. Math. J.,</i> vol. 25, no. 100, pp. 619-633, 1975.
 
10
S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” <i>IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,</i> vol. 6, pp. 721-741, Nov. 1984.
 
11
G.H. Golub and C.F. Van Loan, <i>Matrix Computations.</i> John Hopkins Press, 1989.
 
12
 
13
K. Fukunaga S. Yamada H.S. Stone and T. Kasai, “A Representation of Hypergraphs in the Euclidean Space,” <i>IEEE Trans. Computers,</i> vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 364-367, Apr. 1984.
 
14
Y.G. Leclerc, “Constructing Simple Stable Descriptions for Image Partitioning,” <i>Int'l J. Computer Vision,</i> vol. 3, pp. 73-102, 1989.
 
15
 
16
J. Malik and P. Perona, “Preattentive Texture Discrimination with Early Vision Mechanisms,” <i>J. Optical Soc. Am.,</i> vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 923-932, May 1990.
 
17
D. Mumford and J. Shah, “Optimal Approximations by Piecewise Smooth Functions, and Associated Variational Problems,” <i>Comm. Pure Math.,</i> pp. 577-684, 1989.
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
M. Wertheimer, “Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms (partial translation),” <i>A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psycychology,</i> W.B. Ellis, ed., pp. 71-88, Harcourt, Brace, 1938.
 
25

CITED BY  409

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jianbo Shi: colleagues
Jitendra Malik: colleagues