Putting the feel in ’look and feel‘

ABSTRACT

Haptic devices are now commercially available and thus touch has become a potentially realistic solution to a variety of interaction design challenges. We report on an investigation of the use of touch as a way of reducing visual overload in the conventional desktop. In a two-phase study, we investigated the use of the PHANToM haptic device as a means of interacting with a conventional graphical user interface. The first experiment compared the effects of four different haptic augmentations on usability in a simple targeting task. The second experiment involved a more ecologically-oriented searching and scrolling task. Results indicated that the haptic effects did not improve users performance in terms of task completion time. However, the number of errors made was significantly reduced. Subjective workload measures showed that participants perceived many aspects of workload as significantly less with haptics. The results are described and the implications for the use of haptics in user interface design are discussed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Motoyuki Akamatsu , Sigeru Sato, A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.40 n.3, p.443-453, March 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1020]
• 2: Motoyuki Akamatsu , I. Scott MacKenzie, Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.45 n.4, p.483-493, Oct. 1996 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1996.0063]
• 3: Michel Beaudouin-Lafon , Stéphane Conversy, Auditory illusions for audio feedback, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.299-300, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/257089.257331]
• 4: Brewster, S.A. (1997). Using Non-Speech Sound to Overcome information Overload. Displays, 17,179- 189.
• 5: Brewster, S.A. (1998). The design of sonicallyenhanced widgets, hzteracting with Computers, 11(2), 211-235.
• 6: Campbell, C.S., Zhai, S., May, K.W. & Maglo, P. (1999). What you feel must be what you see: adding tactile feedback to the trackpoint. In IFIP Interact'99, (Edinburgh, UK), lOS Press, 383-390.
• 7: Frits L. Engel , Peter Goossens , Reinder Haakma, Improved efficiency through I- and E-feedback: a trackball with contextual force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.41 n.6, p.949-974, Dec. 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1087]
• 8: Hart, S.G. & Wickens, C. (1990). Workload assessment and prediction. MANPRINT, an approach to systems integration, 257-296, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• 9: Lederman, S.J., Summers, C. & Klatzky, R.L. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception, 25,983-998.
• 10: Timothy Miller , Robert Zeleznik, An insidious Haptic invasion: adding force feedback to the X desktop, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.59-64, November 01-04, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States [doi>10.1145/288392.288573]
• 11: Ramstein, C. (1995). A Multimodal User Interface System with Force Feedback and Physical Models. In IFIP Interact'95, (Lillehammer, Norway) Chapman & Hall, 157-162.
• 12: Christophe Ramstein , Vincent Hayward, The pantograph: a large workspace haptic device for multimodal human computer interaction, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.57-58, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/259963.260039]
• 13: Christophe Ramstein , Odile Martial , Aude Dufresne , Michel Carignan , Patrick Chassé , Philippe Mabilleau, Touching and hearing GUI's: design issues for the PC-Access system, Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Assistive technologies, p.2-9, April 11-12, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/228347.228349]
• 14: Rosenberg, L.B. (1997). FEELit mouse: Adding a realistic sense of FEEL to the computing experience. http ://www.force-feedback.com/feelit
• 15: Srinivasan, M.A. & Basdogan, C. (1997). Haptics in Virtual Environments: Taxonomy, Research Status, and Challenges. Computers and Graphics, 21(4), 393- 404.
• 16: Shumin Zhai , Barton A. Smith , Ted Selker, Improving Browsing Performance: A study of four input devices for scrolling and pointing tasks, Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Interantional Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, p.286-293, July 14-18, 1997

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Haptic I/O

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance, Reliability, Theory

Keywords:
force feedback, haptics, multimodal interaction