Exploring Online Structures on Chinese Government Portals

ABSTRACT

This article explores the communicative structures of Chinese government web sites and their implications for citizen political participation. Taking issue with the party-state's dubious claim of building a transparent, service-oriented, and democratic administration, the study analyzed web features on 31 Chinese provincial government portals. The UN's e-participation framework was adapted to locate venues for citizen involvement. The results suggest that by manipulating online structures, Chinese government resorts to more subtle forms of online social control through information delivery, agenda setting, and containment of public dissent. Limited improvement in administrative efficiency and transparency serves the dual role of deflating social tension and reestablishing party legitimacy. Paradoxically, citizens' political participation may generate unintended consequences of incremental reform of China's local governance and political institutions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ainsworth, S., Hardy, C., & Harely, B. (2005). Online consultation: E-democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 120-145.
• 2: Barber, B.R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• 3: Boas, T. (2004). Weaving the authoritarian web. Current History, 103, 438-443.
• 4: Brady, A. (2006). Guiding hand: The role of the CCP central propaganda department in the current era. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 3, 58-77.
• 5: CCID Consulting. (2006). 2005 Chinese government websites performance evaluation. http://www.ccidconsulting.com/2005govtop/default.shtml.
• 6: Chadwick, A. (2001). The electronic face of government in the internet age: Borrowing from Murray Edelman. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 435-457.
• 7: Andrew Chadwick, Bringing e-democracy back in: why it matters for future research on e-governance, Social Science Computer Review, v.21 n.4, p.443-455, December 2003 [doi>10.1177/0894439303256372]
• 8: Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307-326.
• 9: Chase, M.S., & Mulvenon, J.C. (2002). You've got dissent! Chinese dissident use of the Internet and Beijing's counter-strategies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
• 10: China Internet Network Information Center. ( 2007). The 19th China Internet Network Development Survey Report . Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://www.cnnic.cn/download/2007/cnnic19-threport.pdf.
• 11: China Internet Network Information Center. ( 2008). Statistical Survey Report on the Internet Development in China Abridged Edition. Retrieved July 30, 2008 from http://www.cnnic.cn/download/2008/cnnic22threport-en.pdf.
• 12: Coleman, S. & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
• 13: Cronin, T. (1989). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 14: Dahlberg, L. (1998). Cyberspace and the public sphere: Exploring the democratic potential of the net. Convergence, 4, 70-84.
• 15: Delli Carpini, M. (2006). Delli Carpini's Definitions of Key Terms. Retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://spotlight.macfound.org/main/public_profile/78/Michael_Carpini .
• 16: Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
• 17: Garson, D. (2003). Public information technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
• 18: Gibson, R., Margolis, M., Resnich, D., & Ward, S. (2003). Election campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK. Party Politics, 9, 47-75.
• 19: Åke Grönlund, Emerging electronic infrastructures: exploring democratic components, Social Science Computer Review, v.21 n.1, p.55-72, Spring 2003 [doi>10.1177/0894439302238971]
• 20: Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (William Rehg, Trans). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• 21: Hartford, K. (2005). Dear Mayor: Online communications with local governments in Hangzhou and Nanjing. China Information, 19, 217-260.
• 22: He, B. (1997). The democratic implications of civil society in China. London: Macmillan Press.
• 23: Holzer, M. & Kim, S. (2006). Digital governance in municipalities worldwide 2005: A longitudinal assessment of municipal websites throughout the world . Retrieved February 28, 2006 from http://newark.rutgers.edu/~egovinst/Website/researchpg.htm.
• 24: Shanthi Kalathil , Taylor C. Boas, Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2003
• 25: Kluver, R. (2005). The architecture of control: a Chinese strategy for e-governance. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 75-97.
• 26: E. Leib, & B. He, (Eds.), (2006). In search for deliberative democracy in China. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 27: Lipset, S. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
• 28: Lollar, X. (2006). Assessing China's e-government: Information, service, transparency and citizen outreach websites. Journal of Contemporary China, 15, 31-41.
• 29: Lynch, D. (1999). After the propaganda state: Media, politics and ``thought work'' in reformed China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• 30: Michael Margolis , David Resnick, Politics as Usual, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000
• 31: McCormick, J. (2006). It's their call. Retrieved on March 3, 2006 from http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2006/janfeb/features/fishkin.html .
• 32: Meijer, A., & Zouridis, S. (2004). E-government as institutional transformation. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Innovations through information technology. pp. 565-568. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
• 33: Minzner, C. (2006). Xinfang: An alternative to the formal Chinese legal system. Stanford Journal of International Law, 42, 103-179.
• 34: Noveck, B. (2003). Designing deliberative democracy in cyberspace: The role of the cyber-lawyer. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 9, 1-71.
• 35: Oksenberg, M. (1998). Will China democratize? Journal of Democracy, 9, 27-34.
• 36: Wanda J. Orlikowski, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science, v.11 n.4, p.404-428, July 2000 [doi>10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600]
• 37: Pei, X. (2000). Rights and resistance: The changing contexts of the dissident movement. In E. J. Perry & M. Selden (Eds.), Chinese society: Change conflict and resistance (pp. 20-40). London : Routledge.
• 38: People's Daily Online. (2004). Special report: Why are government websites still ``dormant?'' Retrieved on May 28, 2005 from http://www.people.com.
• 39: Qiu, J.L. (2000). Virtual censorship in China: Keeping the gate between the cyberspaces. International Journal of Communications Laws and Policy, 4, 1-25.
• 40: Sassen, S. (2005). Electronic markets and activist networks: The weight of social logics in digital formations. In R. Latham & S. Sassen (Eds.) Digital formations: IT and new architecture in the global realm (pp. 54-88). Princeton, NJ: University Press.
• 41: Schneider, S.M., & Foot, K. (2002). Online structure for political action: Exploring presidential campaign web sites from the 2000 American election. The Public, 9, 1-17.
• 42: Jeffrey W. Seifert , Jongpil Chung, Using E-Government to Reinforce Government–Citizen Relationships, Social Science Computer Review, v.27 n.1, p.3-23, February 2009 [doi>10.1177/0894439308316404]
• 43: Shambaugh, D. (2008). China's Communist Party: Atrophy and adaptation . Berkeley: University of California Press.
• 44: United Nations Online Network of Public Administration and Finance. (2006). Global E-government Readiness Report 2005: From E-government to E-inclusion. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from http://www.unpan.org/.
• 45: White, G., Howell, J., & Shang, X. (1996). In search of civil society: Market reform and social change in contemporary China. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• 46: Yong, J.S. (2003). Enter the dragon: Informatization in China. In J. S. Yong (Ed.), E-government in Asia: Enabling public service innovation in the 21st century, (pp. 65-96). Hong Kong: Times Media.
• 47: Zhang, J. (2002). Will the government ``serve the people''? The development of Chinese e-government. New Media & Society , 4, 163-184.
• 48: Zhao, Y. (1998). Media, market and democracy in China: Between the party line and the bottom line. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• 49: Zhou, X. (2004). E-government in China: A content analysis of national and provincial web sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication , 9. Retrieved March 19, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/zhou.html.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
China, Internet, UN, control, democracy, government, participation, technology, web site