ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Flexible Diff-ing in a collaborative writing system
Full text PdfPdf (946 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work table of contents
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Pages: 147 - 154  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-542-9
Authors
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 36
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/143457.143473
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Cavalier, T., Chandhok, R., Morris, j., Kaufer, D., and Neuwirth, C.M. A visual design for collaborative work: Columns for commenting and annotation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-24) (Kalua Kona, Hawaii, Jan. 8-11), J.F. Nunamaker, jr., Ed. IEEE Press, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 729-738~
 
3
Cross, G. A. A Bakhtinian exploration of factors affecting the collaborative writing of an executive letter of an annual report. Research in the Teaching of English 24, 2 (May, 1990), 173-203.
4
 
5
Greenberg, S. Personalizable groupware: Accommodating individual roles and group differences. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Sep. 25-27), L. Bannon, Mo Robinson, and Ko Schmidt, Eds. Computer Sciences Company, Slough, UK, 1991, pp. 17-31.
 
6
Haber, R.N., and Schindler, R.M. Error in proofreading: Evidence of syntactic control of letter processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7, (1981), 573- 579.
 
7
Hunt, J.W., and Mcllroy, M.D. An Algorithm for Differential File Comparison, Bell Laboratories, N.J., Computing Science Technical Report No. 41, 1975.
 
8
Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973.
 
9
Lesser, V.R., and Erman, L.D. Distributed interpretation: A model and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-29 12 (Dec., 1980), 1144-1163o
 
10
Miller, W., and Myers, E.W. A file comparison program. Software-Practice and Experience 15, 11 (1985), 1025-1040.
 
11
Myers, E.W. An O(ND) difference algorithm and its variations. Algorithmica I (1986), 251-266o
 
12
Nachbar, D. Spiff--A Program for Making Controlled Approximate Comparisons of Files. In Proceedings of the Summer 1988 USENIX Conference (San Francisco, CA, June 21-24). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, 1988, pp. 73- 84.
13
14
 
15
Samuels, S.J., and Kamil, M.L. Models of the reading process~ in Handbook of Reading Research, D. P. Pearson, Ed. Longman Inc., N.Y., 1984, pp. 185-224.
 
17
Taylor, I., and Taylor, M. M.The Psychology of Reading. Academic Press, N.Y., 1983.

CITED BY  36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christine M. Neuwirth: colleagues
Ravinder Chandhok: colleagues
David S. Kaufer: colleagues
Paul Erion: colleagues
James Morris: colleagues
Dale Miller: colleagues