The effects of menu parallelism on visual search and selection

ABSTRACT

Menus and toolbars are the primary controls for issuing commands in modern interfaces. As software systems continue to support increasingly large command sets, the user's task of locating the desired command control is progressively time consuming. Many factors influence a user's ability to visually search for and select a target in a set of menus or toolbars, one of which is the degree of parallelism in the display arrangement. A fully parallel layout will show all commands at once, allowing the user to visually scan all items without needing to manipulate the interface, but there is a risk that this will harm performance due to excessive visual clutter. At the other extreme, a fully serial display minimises visual clutter by displaying only one item at a time, but separate interface manipulations are necessary to display each item. This paper examines the effects of increasing the number of items displayed to users in menus through parallelism---displaying multiple menus simultaneously, spanning both horizontally and vertically---and compares it to traditional menus and pure serial display menus. We found that moving from serial to a partially parallel (traditional) menu significantly improved user performance, but moving from a partially parallel to a fully parallel menu design had more ambiguous results. The results have direct design implications for the layout of command interfaces.

REFERENCES

• 1: Antti Aaltonen , Aulikki Hyrskykari , Kari-Jouko Räihä, 101 spots, or how do users read menus?, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.132-139, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274664]
• 2: Benjamin B. Bederson, Fisheye menus, Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.217-225, November 06-08, 2000, San Diego, California, United States [doi>10.1145/354401.354782]
• 3: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone , Ken Pier , William Buxton , Tony D. DeRose, Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.73-80, August 02-06, 0093, Anaheim, CA [doi>10.1145/166117.166126]
• 4: Catherine M. Burns, Navigation strategies with ecological displays, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.52 n.1, p.111-129, Jan. 2000 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1999.0326]
• 5: J. Callahan , D. Hopkins , M. Weiser , B. Shneiderman, An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.95-100, May 15-19, 1988, Washington, D.C., United States [doi>10.1145/57167.57182]
• 6: Andy Cockburn , Carl Gutwin , Jason Alexander, Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124774]
• 7: Sarah P. Everett , Michael D. Byrne, Unintended effects: varying icon spacing changes users' visual search strategy, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.695-702, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985780]
• 8: Leah Findlater , Joanna McGrenere, A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.89-96, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985704]
• 9: Fitts, P. M. (1954), 'The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.', Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(6), 381--391.
• 10: Wilbert O. Galitz, The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1997
• 11: Saul Greenberg , Ian H. Witten, Supporting command reuse: empirical foundations and principles, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.39 n.3, p.353-390, Sept. 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1065]
• 12: Carl Gutwin , Andy Cockburn, Improving list revisitation with ListMaps, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 23-26, 2006, Venezia, Italy [doi>10.1145/1133265.1133347]
• 13: Stephen José Hanson , Robert E. Kraut , James M. Farber, Interface design and multivariate analysis of UNIX command use, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.2 n.1, p.42-57, Jan. 1984 [doi>10.1145/357417.357421]
• 14: Beverly L. Harrison , Kim J. Vicente, An experimental evaluation of transparent menu usage, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.391-398, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/238386.238583]
• 15: Anthony J. Hornof, Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.8 n.3, p.171-197, September 2001 [doi>10.1145/502907.502908]
• 16: Gordon Kurtenbach , William Buxton, User learning and performance with marking menus, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.258-264, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191759]
• 17: Gordon Kurtenbach , George W. Fitzmaurice , Russell N. Owen , Thomas Baudel, The Hotbox: efficient access to a large number of menu-items, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.231-237, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303047]
• 18: Ruth Rosenholtz , Yuanzhen Li , Jonathan Mansfield , Zhenlan Jin, Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055078]
• 19: Andrew Sears , Ben Shneiderman, Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.1 n.1, p.27-51, March 1994 [doi>10.1145/174630.174632]
• 20: Nancy Staggers, Impact of screen density on clinical nurses' computer task performance and subjective screen satisfaction, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.39 n.5, p.775-792, Nov. 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1083]
• 21: Thacker, P. P. (1986), Tabular displays: A human factors study, PhD thesis, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
• 22: Treisman, A. (1982), 'Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8(2), 194--214.
• 23: Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. (1980), 'A featureintegration theory of attention', Cognitive Psychology 12(1), 97--136.
• 24: Zipf, G. (1949), Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology, Addison-Wesley Press, Oxford, England.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
display design, information density, menu selection, visual search process