ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Brooks' versus Linus' law: an empirical test of open source projects
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source
dg.o; Vol. 289 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research table of contents
Montreal, Canada
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: System demonstrations and posters table of contents
Pages 423-424  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-099-9
Authors
Charles M. Schweik  University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
Robert C. English  University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
Meelis Kitsing  University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
Sandra Haire  University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
Sponsors
: Routledge
: Elsevier
: Springer
: Cefrio
NCDG : National Center for Digital Government
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 72,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate collective action in open source software development, where both volunteers and paid professionals essentially produce a public good. By using a large dataset, our logistic regression shows that adding more programming staff to the software projects increases their probability of success. This finding contradicts some dominant theories on software development as well as on the provision of public goods. As governments worldwide increasingly rely on open source software, our analysis has concrete implications for the public sector in contributing to the success of these projects.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ghosh, R. A., Glott, R., Gerloff, K., Schmitz, P-E., Aisola, K., and Boujraf, A. 2007. "Study on the Effect on the Development of the Information Society of European Public Bodies Making Their Own Software Available as Open Source: Final Report." http://www.publicsectoross.info/images/resources/15_154_file.pdf.
 
2
Wong, K. 2004. Free/Open Source Software: Government Policy. United Nations Development Programme-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP).
 
3
 
4
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 35
 
5
Abdel-Hamid, T. K., and Madnick, S. E. 1990. "The Elusive Silver Lining: How We Fail to Learn from Software Development Failures." Sloan Management Review 32: 1. pp.39--48.
 
6
Jones, P. 2000. Brooks' law and Open Source: The more the merrier? IBM, 4(10) http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/merrier.html.
 
7
 
8
English, R. and Schweik, C. M. Forthcoming. "Identifying Success and Abandonment of FLOSS Commons: A Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects." Upgrade: The European Journal for the Informatics Professional.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Charles M. Schweik: colleagues
Robert C. English: colleagues
Meelis Kitsing: colleagues
Sandra Haire: colleagues