ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimal parameters for efficient crossing-based dialog boxes
Full text PdfPdf (479 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Fitt's Law Lives table of contents
Pages 1623-1632  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Morgan Dixon  University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA
François Guimbretière  University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA
Nicholas Chen  University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 92,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357307
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an empirical analysis of crossing-based dialog boxes. First, we study the spatial constraints required for efficient crossing-based interactions in the case of a simple multi-parameter dialog box. Through a series of 3 tasks, we establish the minimal value of the landing margin, the takeoff margin, and the column width. We also offer an estimation of the role of stroke shape on user performance. After studying the reasons for errors during our experiment, we propose a relaxed crossing semantic that combines aspects of pointing and crossing-based interfaces.

To test our design, we compare a naïve dialog box implementation with our new implementation, as well as a standard point-and-click dialog box. Our results reveal that there is not a significant difference between the naïve crossing implementation and the standard point-and-click interface and that the new crossing semantic is faster than both the naïve crossing implementation and the point-and-click interface, despite a higher error rate.

Together these two experiments establish that crossing-based dialog boxes can be as spatially efficient and faster than their point-and-click counterpart. Our new semantic provides the first step towards a smooth transition from point-and-click interfaces to crossing-based interfaces.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Apple Developer Connection. 2006.
2
 
3
Accot, J., Les Tâches Trajectorielles en Interaction Homme-Machine--Cas des tâches de navigation., PhD thesis, Université de Toulouse 1. 2001
4
5
6
7
8
 
9
Card, S.K., W.K. English, and B.J. Burr, Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys and Text Keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 1978. 21(8): p. 601 -- 613.
 
10
Douglas, D.H. and T.K. Peucker, Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a line or its caricature. The Canadian Cartographer, 1973. 10(2): p. 112--122.
 
11
Fitts, P.M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: p. 381 -- 391.
 
12
Geissler, J. Gedrics: the next generation of icons. Proceedings of INTERACT'95, pp. 73 -- 78.
13
 
14
Lank, E. and E. Saund. Sloppy Selection: Providing an Accurate Interpretation of Imprecise Stylus Selection Gestures. Proceedings of Computers and Graphics, pp. 490 -- 500.
15
16
17


Collaborative Colleagues:
Morgan Dixon: colleagues
François Guimbretière: colleagues
Nicholas Chen: colleagues