ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing with data non-determinism: Wait time management for peer-to-peer systems
Source Computer Communications archive
Volume 31 ,  Issue 3  (February 2008) table of contents
Pages 629-642  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0140-3664
Authors
Javed I. Khan  Media Communications and Networking Research Laboratory, Department of Math & Computer Science, Kent State University, 233 MSB, Kent, OH 44242, USA
Asrar U. Haque  Media Communications and Networking Research Laboratory, Department of Math & Computer Science, Kent State University, 233 MSB, Kent, OH 44242, USA
Publisher
Butterworth-Heinemann  Newton, MA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1016/j.comcom.2007.08.047

ABSTRACT

One of the unusual challenges faced by peer-to-peer algorithms as opposed to classical distributed algorithms is that these have to compute with data non-determinism where there is no guarantee that data from a particular node will be delivered in time or delivered at all. Each distributed component not only has to work in such environment, but also has to decide how long to wait for peers to respond. A large wait can inordinately delay entire computation. A smaller wait can reduce the coverage of the algorithm and drastically degenerate the quality of final result produced. In this paper, we investigate a set of wait management schemas which tries to minimize the overall completion time and maximize the quality of solution. We present detail analyses of the schemas for various scenarios including large power law networks and forms of non-responsiveness. The work promises dramatic improvement in peer-to-peer search and other computations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
[1]
 
[2]
Jianfei Cai, Wenning Zhan, Zhihai He, Optimal Retransmission Timeout Selection For Delay-Constrained Multimedia Communications, International Conference on Image Processing, October 2004, vol. 3, pp. 2035-2038, doi:10.1109/ICIP.2004.1421483.
 
[3]
 
[4]
M. Grossglauser, Optimal deterministic timeouts for reliable scalable multicast, in: IEEE Infocom'96, (1996) 1425-1441.
[5]
 
[6]
N.G. Duffield, F. Lo Presti, Multicast Inference of Packet Delay Variance at Interior Networks Links, in: Proc. Infocom'2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, (2000) 26-30.
 
[7]
Adams, A., Bu, T., Caceres, R., Duffield, N., Friedman, T., Horowitz, J., Lo Presti, F., Moon, S.B., Paxson, V. and Towsley, D., The use of end-to-end multicast measurements for characterizing internal network behavior. IEEE Communications Magazine.
 
[8]
F. Lo Presti, N.G. Duffield, J, Horowitz, D. Towsley, Multicast-Based Inference of Network-Internal Delay Distributions, preprint, AT&T Labs and University of Massachusetts (1999).
[9]
 
[10]
M.J. Coates, R. Nowak, Network Delay Distribution Inference from End-to-end Unicast Measurement, in: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (2001).
 
[11]
Shih, Meng-Fu and Hero, Alfred, Unicast-Based Inference of Network Link Delay Distributions with Finite Mixture Models. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing. v51. 2219-2228.
 
[12]
 
[13]
K.G. Anagnostakis, M.B. Greenwald, Direct measurement versus indirect inference for determining networkinternal delays, in: Proceedings of Performance (2002).
 
[14]
Y. Shavitt, X. Sun, A. Wool, B. Yener. Computing the unmeasured: an algebraic approach to mapping the Internet, in: Proc. IEEE Infocom, Anchorage, AK (2001).
 
[15]
K.G. Anagnostakis, M. Greenwald, R. Ryger, Cing: Measuring network-internal delay using only existing infrastructure, in: Proc. IEEE Infocom, San Francisco, CA (2003).
 
[17]
Calvert, Kenneth L., Griffioen, James, Mullins, Billy, Sehgal, Amit and Wen, Su, Concast: Design and implementation of an active network service. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications. v19 i3. 404-409.
 
[18]
Wolf, Tilman and Choi, Sumi Yunsun, Aggregated hierarchical multicast for active networks. Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM.
 
[19]
David Tucker, Survey of Searching Methods in Internet Peer-to-Peer Systems. Available from: http://www.medianet.kent.edu/surveys/IAD03F-dtucker/index.html.
 
[20]
Alok Prakash, A Survey of Advanced Search in P2P Networks. Available from: http://www.medianet.kent.edu/surveys/IAD06S-p2psearch-alok/index.html.
 
[21]
 
[22]
Javed I. Khan, Asrar U. Haque, Maximizing Lifetime of Power Limited Network with Active Minimum Spanning Tree Aggregation, in: Proceedings of the 17th Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, PDCS 2004, MIT, Cambridge, USA, ACTA Press, ISBN: 0-88986-421-7, November 9-11, 2004, v.439-055.
 
[23]
Asrar U. Haque, Javed I. Khan, Optimum Bounded Wait Communication for Systems with Distributed Autonomous Components, Technical Report, Kent State University, August 2006. Available from: http://medianet.kent.edu/techreports.html.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Javed I. Khan: colleagues
Asrar U. Haque: colleagues