ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Scalable semantic web data management using vertical partitioning
Full text PdfPdf (272 KB)
Source
Very Large Data Bases archive
Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases table of contents
Vienna, Austria
SESSION: Research sessions: web data management and search table of contents
Pages: 411-422  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-649-3
Authors
Sponsors
ORACLE : ORACLE
: HP invent
: Yahoo! Research
IBM : IBM
: Intel
: Connex.cc
: SAP
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: WKO
: Google
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 243,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Efficient management of RDF data is an important factor in realizing the Semantic Web vision. Performance and scalability issues are becoming increasingly pressing as Semantic Web technology is applied to real-world applications. In this paper, we examine the reasons why current data management solutions for RDF data scale poorly, and explore the fundamental scalability limitations of these approaches. We review the state of the art for improving performance for RDF databases and consider a recent suggestion, "property tables." We then discuss practically and empirically why this solution has undesirable features. As an improvement, we propose an alternative solution: vertically partitioning the RDF data. We compare the performance of vertical partitioning with prior art on queries generated by a Web-based RDF browser over a large-scale (more than 50 million triples) catalog of library data. Our results show that a vertical partitioned schema achieves similar performance to the property table technique while being much simpler to design. Further, if a column-oriented DBMS (a database architected specially for the vertically partitioned case) is used instead of a row-oriented DBMS, another order of magnitude performance improvement is observed, with query times dropping from minutes to several seconds.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Library catalog data. http://simile.mit.edu/rdf-test-data/barton/.
 
2
Longwell website. http://simile.mit.edu/longwell/.
 
3
Redland RDF Application Framework. http://librdf.org/.
 
4
Simile website. http://simile.mit.edu/.
 
5
Swoogle. http://swoogle.umbc.edu/.
 
6
Uniprot rdf dataset. http://dev.isb-sib.ch/projects/uniprot-rdf/.
 
7
Wordnet rdf dataset. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/.
 
8
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/.
 
9
RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer, 2004.
 
10
RDQL - A Query Language for RDF. W3C Member Submission 9 January 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/RDQL/, 2004.
 
11
SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Working Draft 4 October 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/, 2006.
 
12
D. Abadi, A. Marcus, S. Madden, and K. Hollenbach. Using the Barton libraries dataset as an RDF benchmark. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2007-036, MIT.
 
13
D. J. Abadi. Column stores for wide and sparse data. In CIDR, 2007.
14
 
15
D. J. Abadi, D. S. Myers, D. J. DeWitt, and S. R. Madden. Materialization strategies in a column-oriented DBMS. In Proc. of ICDE, 2007.
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
P. A. Boncz, M. Zukowski, and N. Nes. MonetDB/X100: Hyper-pipelining query execution. In CIDR, pages 225--237, 2005.
 
20
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
J. Corwin, A. Silberschatz, P. L. Miller, and L. Marenco. Dynamic tables: An architecture for managing evolving, heterogeneous biomedical data in relational database management systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(1):86--93, 2007.
 
25
D. Florescu and D. Kossmann. Storing and querying XML data using an RDMBS. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 22(3):27--34, 1999.
 
26
S. Harris and N. Gibbins. 3store: Efficient bulk RDF storage. In In Proc. of PSSS'03, pages 1--15, 2003.
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
K. Wilkinson. Jena property table implementation. In SSWS, 2006.
 
32
K. Wilkinson, C. Sayers, H. Kuno, and D. Reynolds. Efficient RDF Storage and Retrieval in Jena2. In SWDB, pages 131--150, 2003.

CITED BY  19
Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel J. Abadi: colleagues
Adam Marcus: colleagues
Samuel R. Madden: colleagues
Kate Hollenbach: colleagues