ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fundamental and secondary issues in the design of non-procedural relational languages
Source Very Large Data Bases archive
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Very Large Data Bases - Volume 5 table of contents
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Pages: 239 - 250  
Year of Publication: 1979
Author
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

A number of high-level data manipulation languages have been proposed for the relational model. This paper summarizes results of an analysis of languages and attempts to evaluate various criteria as to their capability of accounting for differences among languages.

The distinction between fundamental and secondary characteristics of languages is not the result of a speculative exploration of which features should be made available in a relational language. Instead, this distinction is based on a comparison of existing languages as they are described in the literature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
[3] ...
 
4
[4] ...
5
 
6
[6] Jean-Marc Cadiou: On Semantic Issues in the Relational Model of Data. MFCS 1976: 23-38
7
 
8
[8] ...
 
9
[9] ...
 
10
[10] Chin-Liang Chang: DEDUCE 2: Further Investigations of Deduction in Relational Data Bases. Logic and Data Bases 1977: 201-236
11
 
12
[12] Eric K. Clemons: An External Schema Facility to Support Data Base Update. JCDKB 1978: 371
 
13
[13] E. F. Codd: A Database Sublanguage Founded on the Relational Calculus. SIGFIDET Workshop 1971: 35-68
 
14
[14] E. F. Codd: Relational Completeness of Data Base Sublanguages. In: R. Rustin (ed.): Database Systems: 65-98, Prentice Hall and IBM Research Report RJ 987, San Jose, California : (1972)
 
15
[15] E. F. Codd: How About Recently? (English Dialog with Relational Data Bases Using Rendevous Version 1). JCDKB 1978: 3-28
 
16
[16] ...
 
17
[17] Umeshwar Dayal, Philip A. Bernstein: On the Updatability of Relational Views. VLDB 1978: 368-377
 
18
[18] Antonio L. Furtado: Formal aspects of the relational model. Inf. Syst. 3(2): 131-140(1978)
 
19
[19] David Greenblatt, Jerry Waxman: A Study of Three Database Query Languages. JCDKB 1978: 77-97
 
20
[20] ...
 
21
[21] ...
 
22
[22] ...
 
23
[23] ...
 
24
[24] ...
 
25
[25] ...
 
26
[26] ...
 
27
[27] ...
 
28
[28] Michel Lacroix, Alain Pirotte: Domain-Oriented Relational Languages. VLDB 1977: 370-378
 
29
[29] ...
 
30
[30] ...
 
31
[31] Nancy H. McDonald, Michael Stonebraker: CUPID - The Friendly Query Language. ACM Pacific 1975: 127-131
 
32
33
 
34
[34] Jean-Marie Nicolas, Hervé Gallaire: Data Base: Theory vs. Interpretation. Logic and Data Bases 1977: 33-54
 
35
[35] ...
 
36
[36] ...
 
37
[37] ...
 
38
[38] ...
 
39
[39] ...
 
40
[40] Alain Pirotte: High Level Data Base Query Languages. Logic and Data Bases 1977: 409-436
 
41
[41] ...
 
42
[42] ...
 
43
[43] Phyllis Reisner: Use of Psychological Experimentation as an Aid to Development of a Query Language. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 3(3): 218-229(1977)
 
44
[44] Nick Roussopoulos, John Mylopoulos: Using Semantic Networks for Database Management. VLDB 1975: 144-172
45
46
 
47
[47] ...
 
48
[48] ...
 
49
[49] ...
 
50
[50] ...
51
 
52
[52] Michael Stonebraker, Lawrence A. Rowe: Observations on Data Manipulation Languages and Their Embedding in General Purpose Programming Languages. VLDB 1977: 128-143
 
53
[53] ...
 
54
[54] John C. Thomas: Psychological Issues in Data Base Management. VLDB 1977: 169-186
 
55
[55] E. Vandijck: Towards a more familiar relational retrieval language. Inf. Syst. 2(4): 159-169(1977)
56
 
57
[57] ...
 
58
[58] ...
 
59
[59] Moshé M. Zloof: Query-by-Example: A Data Base Language. IBM Systems Journal 16(4): 324-343(1977)
 
60
[60] ...