On the Impact of a Collaborative Pedagogy on African American Millennial Students in Software Engineering

ABSTRACT

Millennial students (those born after 1982), particularly African Americans and women, have demonstrated a propensity toward collaborative activities. We conducted a collective case study at North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T to ascertain the role of collaboration and social interaction in attracting and retaining students in information technology. Responses from semi-structured interviews with 11 representative African American students in these classes were coded and analyzed. The responses from these minority students were used to evolve a social interaction model. The conjectures generated from the model suggest that pair programming and agile software methodologies effectively create a collaborative environment that is desirable to Millennial students, male and female, and, with the new evidence, minority and majority. Additionally, the African American Millennial students enjoy learning from their peers and believe that a collaborative environment better prepares them for the "real world."

REFERENCES

• 1: [1] American Association of University Women Education Foundation, Educating Girls in the New Computer Age, 2000, http://www.aauw.org/member_center/publications/TechSavvy/T echSavvy.pdf, accessed
• 2: [2] V. R. Basili and A. J. Turner, "Iterative Enhancement: A Practical Technique for Software Development," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, 1975, pp. 266-270.
• 3: Kent Beck , Cynthia Andres, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004
• 4: [4] K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, R. Jeffries, J. Kern, B. Marick, R. C. Martin, S. Mellor, K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, and D. Thomas, "The Agile Manifesto," http://www.agileAlliance.org, 2001 2001.
• 5: Sarah B. Berenson , Kelli M. Slaten , Laurie Williams , Chih-Wei Ho, Voices of women in a software engineering course: reflections on collaboration, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), v.4 n.1, p.3-es, March 2004 [doi>10.1145/1060071.1060074]
• 6: [6] S. B. Berenson, L. Williams, and K. M. Slaten, "Using Pair Programming and Agile Development Methods in a University Software Engineering Course to Develop a Model of Social Interactions," Crossing Cultures, Changing Lives Conference, Oxford, UK, 2005, pp. to appear.
• 7: [7] M. T. H. Chi, "Self-Explaining: The Dual Process of Generating Inference and Repairing Mental Models," in Advances in Instructional Psychology, R. Glaser, Ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000, pp. 161-238.
• 8: Alistair Cockburn, Agile software development, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 9: J. McGrath Cohoon, Toward improving female retention in the computer science major, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.5, p.108-114, May 2001 [doi>10.1145/374308.374367]
• 10: [10] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
• 11: Bill Curtis, Modeling the software process: three problems overcome with behavioral models of the software development process (panel session), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, p.398-399, May 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/74587.74643]
• 12: [12] M. Fowler and J. Highsmith, "The Agile Manifesto," in Software Development, August 2001, pp. 28-32.
• 13: [13] P. Freeman and W. Aspray, "The Supply of Information Technology Workers in the United States," Computing Research Association, Washington, DC, 1999.
• 14: [14] R. E. Fullilove and P. U. Treisman, "Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates of the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program," Journal of Negro Education, vol. 59, no. 3, 1990, pp. 463-478.
• 15: Anthony Joseph , Mabel Payne, Group dynamics and collaborative group performance, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 16: [16] D. Keirsey, Please Understand Me II. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, 1998.
• 17: Craig Larman, Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide, Pearson Education, 2003
• 18: Craig Larman , Victor R. Basili, Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History, Computer, v.36 n.6, p.47-56, June 2003 [doi>10.1109/MC.2003.1204375]
• 19: [19] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
• 20: Lucas Layman, Changing Students' Perceptions: An Analysis of the Supplementary Benefits of Collaborative Software Development, Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06), p.159-166, April 19-21, 2006 [doi>10.1109/CSEET.2006.10]
• 21: Lucas Layman , Travis Cornwell , Laurie Williams, Personality types, learning styles, and an agile approach to software engineering education, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-05, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA
• 22: [22] L. Layman, L. Williams, J. Osborne, S. Berenson, K. Slaten, and M. Vouk, "How and Why Collaborative Software Development Impacts the Software Engineering Course," Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN, 2005, pp. T4C 9-14.
• 23: [23] J. Margolis and A. F. (1997), "Geek Mythology and Attracting Undergraduate Women to Computer Science," Joint National Conference in Engineering Program Advocates Network and the National Association of Minority Engineering Program Administrators., 1997, pp.
• 24: [24] J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002.
• 25: Nachiappan Nagappan , Laurie Williams , Miriam Ferzli , Eric Wiebe , Kai Yang , Carol Miller , Suzanne Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 26: [26] C. E. Nelson, "Student Diversity Requires Different Approaches to College Teaching, Even in Math and Science," American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 40, no. 2, 1996, pp. 165-175.
• 27: [27] D. Oblinger, "Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the New Students," Educause Review, vol. 38, no. 4, July/August 2003, pp. 37-47.
• 28: [28] D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation. Boulder, CO: Educause, 2005.
• 29: [29] C. Raines, Managing Millennials, 2002, http://www.generationsatwork.com/articles/millenials.htm, accessed February 12, 2006.
• 30: Carolyn B. Seaman, Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.25 n.4, p.557-572, July 1999 [doi>10.1109/32.799955]
• 31: Kelli M. Slaten , Sarah B. Berenson , Laurie Williams , Lucas Layman , Maria Droujkova, Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pair Programming and Agile Software Methodologies: Verifying a Model of Social Interaction, Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, p.323-330, July 24-29, 2005 [doi>10.1109/ADC.2005.48]
• 32: [32] R. E. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1995.
• 33: [33] A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures of Developing Grounded Theory, Second ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
• 34: [34] U. Treisman, "Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college.," The College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, 1992, pp. 362-372.
• 35: [35] E. Walker and L. O'Neill, "IT courses and the IT industry: Does the future rely on gender or generation?," Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Perth, Australia., 2002, pp. 695-703.
• 36: [36] J. L. Wertsch and C. Toma, "Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach," in Constructivism in Education, L. Steffe and J. Gale, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 159-174.
• 37: Laurie Williams , Robert Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 38: Laurie Ann Williams , Robert R. Kessler, The collaborative software process(sm), The University of Utah, 2000

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education
          Subjects: Collaborative learning

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.m Miscellaneous
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems analysis and design

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors