|
Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.
ABSTRACT
Spyware is an increasing problem. Interestingly, many programs carrying spyware honestly disclose the activities of the software, but users install the software anyway. We report on a study of software installation to assess the effectiveness of different notices for helping people make better decisions on which software to install. Our study of 222 users showed that providing a short summary notice, in addition to the End User License Agreement (EULA), before the installation reduced the number of software installations significantly. We also found that providing the short summary notice after installation led to a significant number of uninstalls. However, even with the short notices, many users installed the program and later expressed regret for doing so. These results, along with a detailed analysis of installation, regret, and survey data about user behaviors informs our recommendations to policymakers and designers for assessing the "adequacy" of consent in the context of software that exhibits behaviors associated with spyware.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Abrams, M., M. P. Eisenhauer, and L.J. Sotto Letter to Federal Trade Commission. March 29, 2004. Re: alternative forms of privacy notices, project no. P034815. Hunton & Williams: The Center for Information Policy Leadership.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Anti Spyware Coalition, Anti Spyware Coalition Definitions and Supporting Documents, Working Report (June 29, 2006), available at http://www.antispywarecoalition.org/documents/documents/ASCDefinitionsWorkingReport20060622.pdf
|
| |
4
|
AOL and National Cyber Security Alliance. 2004. AOL/NCSA online safety study, (October). http://www.security.iia.net.au/downloads/safety_study_v04.pdf
|
| |
5
|
Bellia, P. L. Spyware and the Limits of Surveillance Law, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1283 (2005)
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Blanke, J. M. "Robust Notice" and "informed Consent:" the Keys to Successful Spyware Legilsation, 7 Coum. Sci & Tech. L. Rev. 2 (2006).
|
| |
8
|
Buenaventura, M. A. Teaching a Man to Fish: Why National Legislation Anchored in Notice and Consent Provisions is the Most Effective Solution to the Spyware Problem, 13 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2006).
|
| |
9
|
Calinski, R.B. and Harabasz, J. 1974. "A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis," Comm. in Statistics, vol. 3, pp. 1--27.
|
| |
10
|
Cranor, L.F., J. Reagle, and M. S. Ackerman.1999. Beyond concern: Understanding net users' attitudes about online privacy. In Ingo Vogelsang and Benjamin M. Compaine, eds. The Internet Upheaval: Raising Questions, Seeking Answers in Communications Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, p. 47--70.
|
| |
11
|
Cutrell, E., M. Czerwinski, and E. Horvitz. 2001. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. Proceedings of Interact 2001: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan. http://research.microsoft.com/~cutrell/interact2001messaging.pdf.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Earthlink. 2005. Earthlink spy audit: Results complied from Webroot's and Earthlink's Spy Audit programs, http://www.earthlink.net/spyaudit/press.
|
| |
14
|
Federal Trade Commission, Monitoring Software on Your PC: Spyware, Adware, and Other Software, http:www.ftc.gov/os/2005/03/050307spywarerpt.pdf
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Goecks, J. and Mynatt., E.D. 2005. Supporting Privacy Management via Community Experience and Expertise, Proceedings of 2005 Conference on Communities and Technology, p. 397--418.
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Nathaniel Good , Rachna Dhamija , Jens Grossklags , David Thaw , Steven Aronowitz , Deirdre Mulligan , Joseph Konstan, Stopping spyware at the gate: a user study of privacy, notice and spyware, Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Usable privacy and security, p.43-52, July 06-08, 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
[doi> 10.1145/1073001.1073006]
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
Clare-Marie Karat , John Karat , Carolyn Brodie , Jinjuan Feng, Evaluating interfaces for privacy policy rule authoring, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1124772.1124787]
|
| |
22
|
Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things, 1988.
|
 |
23
|
Sarah Spiekermann , Jens Grossklags , Bettina Berendt, E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, p.38-47, October 14-17, 2001, Tampa, Florida, USA
[doi> 10.1145/501158.501163]
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
Van Dantzich, M., R. Daniel, E. Horvitz, and M. Czerwinski. 2002. Scope: Providing awareness of multiple notifications at a glance. Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces 2002, Trento, Italy.
|
| |
27
|
Vila, T., R. Greenstadt, and D. Molnar. 2004. Why we can't be bothered to read privacy policies: Models of privacy economics as a lemons market. In Economics of Information Security. Vol 12 of Advances in Information Security, eds. L.J. Camp and S. Lewis, 143--154. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
| |
28
|
Wayne R. Barnes, Rethinking Spyware: Questioning the Propriety of Contractual Consent to Online Surveillance, 39 U.C. Davis L. Rev 1545 (2006).
|
| |
29
|
Winn, J. Contracting Spyware by Contract, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1345 (2005).
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
|
|
|
Serge Egelman , Janice Tsai , Lorrie Faith Cranor , Alessandro Acquisti, Timing is everything?: the effects of timing and placement of online privacy indicators, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Graphical user interfaces (GUI)
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Standardization;
User-centered design;
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)
J.
Computer Applications
J.4
SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Subjects:
Psychology
K.
Computing Milieux
K.4
COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
K.4.1
Public Policy Issues
Subjects:
Privacy;
Regulation
K.5
LEGAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING
K.5.2
Governmental Issues
Subjects:
Regulation
General Terms:
Measurement
Keywords:
end user license agreement,
notice,
privacy,
security,
spyware,
timing
|