ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Noticing notice: a large-scale experiment on the timing of software license agreements
Full text PdfPdf (419 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Web usability table of contents
Pages: 607 - 616  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Nathaniel S. Good  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Jens Grossklags  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Deirdre K. Mulligan  Boalt School of Law, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Joseph A. Konstan  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240720
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Spyware is an increasing problem. Interestingly, many programs carrying spyware honestly disclose the activities of the software, but users install the software anyway. We report on a study of software installation to assess the effectiveness of different notices for helping people make better decisions on which software to install. Our study of 222 users showed that providing a short summary notice, in addition to the End User License Agreement (EULA), before the installation reduced the number of software installations significantly. We also found that providing the short summary notice after installation led to a significant number of uninstalls. However, even with the short notices, many users installed the program and later expressed regret for doing so. These results, along with a detailed analysis of installation, regret, and survey data about user behaviors informs our recommendations to policymakers and designers for assessing the "adequacy" of consent in the context of software that exhibits behaviors associated with spyware.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abrams, M., M. P. Eisenhauer, and L.J. Sotto Letter to Federal Trade Commission. March 29, 2004. Re: alternative forms of privacy notices, project no. P034815. Hunton & Williams: The Center for Information Policy Leadership.
 
2
 
3
Anti Spyware Coalition, Anti Spyware Coalition Definitions and Supporting Documents, Working Report (June 29, 2006), available at http://www.antispywarecoalition.org/documents/documents/ASCDefinitionsWorkingReport20060622.pdf
 
4
AOL and National Cyber Security Alliance. 2004. AOL/NCSA online safety study, (October). http://www.security.iia.net.au/downloads/safety_study_v04.pdf
 
5
Bellia, P. L. Spyware and the Limits of Surveillance Law, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1283 (2005)
 
6
 
7
Blanke, J. M. "Robust Notice" and "informed Consent:" the Keys to Successful Spyware Legilsation, 7 Coum. Sci & Tech. L. Rev. 2 (2006).
 
8
Buenaventura, M. A. Teaching a Man to Fish: Why National Legislation Anchored in Notice and Consent Provisions is the Most Effective Solution to the Spyware Problem, 13 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2006).
 
9
Calinski, R.B. and Harabasz, J. 1974. "A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis," Comm. in Statistics, vol. 3, pp. 1--27.
 
10
Cranor, L.F., J. Reagle, and M. S. Ackerman.1999. Beyond concern: Understanding net users' attitudes about online privacy. In Ingo Vogelsang and Benjamin M. Compaine, eds. The Internet Upheaval: Raising Questions, Seeking Answers in Communications Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, p. 47--70.
 
11
Cutrell, E., M. Czerwinski, and E. Horvitz. 2001. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. Proceedings of Interact 2001: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan. http://research.microsoft.com/~cutrell/interact2001messaging.pdf.
12
 
13
Earthlink. 2005. Earthlink spy audit: Results complied from Webroot's and Earthlink's Spy Audit programs, http://www.earthlink.net/spyaudit/press.
 
14
Federal Trade Commission, Monitoring Software on Your PC: Spyware, Adware, and Other Software, http:www.ftc.gov/os/2005/03/050307spywarerpt.pdf
 
15
 
16
Goecks, J. and Mynatt., E.D. 2005. Supporting Privacy Management via Community Experience and Expertise, Proceedings of 2005 Conference on Communities and Technology, p. 397--418.
17
18
19
20
21
 
22
Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things, 1988.
23
24
 
25
 
26
Van Dantzich, M., R. Daniel, E. Horvitz, and M. Czerwinski. 2002. Scope: Providing awareness of multiple notifications at a glance. Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces 2002, Trento, Italy.
 
27
Vila, T., R. Greenstadt, and D. Molnar. 2004. Why we can't be bothered to read privacy policies: Models of privacy economics as a lemons market. In Economics of Information Security. Vol 12 of Advances in Information Security, eds. L.J. Camp and S. Lewis, 143--154. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 
28
Wayne R. Barnes, Rethinking Spyware: Questioning the Propriety of Contractual Consent to Online Surveillance, 39 U.C. Davis L. Rev 1545 (2006).
 
29
Winn, J. Contracting Spyware by Contract, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1345 (2005).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nathaniel S. Good: colleagues
Jens Grossklags: colleagues
Deirdre K. Mulligan: colleagues
Joseph A. Konstan: colleagues