APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
|
|
Supplemental material for Phosphor: explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects
|
Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.
ABSTRACT
Sometimes users fail to notice a change that just took place on their display. For example, the user may have accidentally deleted an icon or a remote collaborator may have changed settings in a control panel. Animated transitions can help, but they force users to wait for the animation to complete. This can be cumbersome, especially in situations where users did not need an explanation. We propose a different approach. Phosphor objects show the outcome of their transition instantly; at the same time they explain their change in retrospect. Manipulating a phosphor slider, for example, leaves an afterglow that illustrates how the knob moved. The parallelism of instant outcome and explanation supports both types of users. Users who already understood the transition can continue interacting without delay, while those who are inexperienced or may have been distracted can take time to view the effects at their own pace. We present a framework of transition designs for widgets, icons, and objects in drawing programs. We evaluate phosphor objects in two user studies and report significant performance benefits for phosphor objects.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Assa, J., Caspi, Y., and Cohen-Or, D. Action synopsis: pose selection and illustration. In Proc. Siggraph'05, pp. 667--676.
|
 |
2
|
Ronald Baecker , Ian Small , Richard Mander, Bringing icons to life, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.1-6, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
[doi> 10.1145/108844.108845]
|
| |
3
|
Bartram, L. Can motion increase user interface bandwidth? In Proc. IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics'97. pp. 1686--1692.
|
| |
4
|
Bartram, L., Ware, C. and Calvert, T. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction, Interact 2001.
|
| |
5
|
Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., and Robertson, G. High-Density Cursor: A Visualization Technique that Helps Users Keep Track of Fast-Moving Mouse Cursors. In Proc. Interact'03, pp. 236--243.
|
| |
6
|
Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P. Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-operated Systems. In Proc. Interact'03, pp. 57--64.
|
| |
7
|
Bétrancourt, M. and Tversky, B. (in press). Simple animations for organizing diagrams. International Journal of Human Computer Studies.
|
| |
8
|
Cavanagh, P. and Alvarez, G. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, Vol. 9. No. 7, pp. 249--354, July 2005
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Feiner, S. APEX: An Experiment in the Automatic Creation of Pictorial Explanations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 5(11), pp. 29--37, 1985.
|
| |
12
|
Flash components: download.macromedia.com/pub/documentation/en/flash/fl8/fl8_using_components.pdf
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
William C. Hill , James D. Hollan , Dave Wroblewski , Tim McCandless, Edit wear and read wear, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.3-9, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/142750.142751]
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Lowe, R. Interactive animated diagrams: what information is extracted? In Proc. First International Conference on Using Complex Information Systems, Sept. 4-6 '96, Poitiers, France.
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
McCloud, S. Understanding Comics. Perennial Currents, 1994.
|
| |
24
|
McCrickard, S., Catrambone, R., and Stasko, J. Evaluating Animation in the Periphery as a Mechanism for Maintaining Awareness. In Proc. INTERACT'01, pp. 148--156.
|
| |
25
|
Oksama, L. and Hyöna, J. Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher-order cognition? An individual difference approach. Visual Cognition, Vol. 11, pp. 631--671, 2004.
|
| |
26
|
Reynolds, C. Stylized Depiction in Computer Graphics: Non-Photorealistic, Painterly and 'Toon Rendering. An annotated survey of online resources www.red3d.com/cwr/npr
|
 |
27
|
George Robertson , Kim Cameron , Mary Czerwinski , Daniel Robbins, Polyarchy visualization: visualizing multiple intersecting hierarchies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
[doi> 10.1145/503376.503452]
|
 |
28
|
G. Robertson , S. K. Card , J. D. Mackinlay, The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces, Proceedings of the 2nd annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User interface software and technology, p.10-18, November 13-15, 1989, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/73660.73662]
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
Ware, C., Neufeld, E. and Bartram, L. Visualizing Causal Relations. In Proc. INFOVIZ '99, pp. 39--42.
|
| |
34
|
Wickens, C. And Carswell, C. The proximity compatibility principle: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors 37, 473--494, 1995.
|
 |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
Yantis, S. Multi-element visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psych. 24, pp. 295--340, 1992.
|
CITED BY 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Schmidt , Tobias Isenberg , Pauline Jepp , Karan Singh , Brian Wyvill, Sketching, scaffolding, and inking: a visual history for interactive 3D modeling, Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering, August 04-05, 2007, San Diego, California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|