Implications for design

ABSTRACT

Although ethnography has become a common approach in HCI research and design, considerable confusion still attends both ethnographic practice and the criteria by which it should be evaluated in HCI. Often, ethnography is seen as an approach to field investigation that can generate requirements for systems development; by that token, the major evaluative criterion for an ethnographic study is the implications it can provide for design. Exploring the nature of ethnographic inquiry, this paper suggests that "implications for design" may not be the best metric for evaluation and may, indeed, fail to capture the value of ethnographic investigations.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ackerman, M. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 179--203.
• 2: Anderson, R. 1994. Representation and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 151--182.
• 3: Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
• 4: Becker, H. 1993. Theory: The Necessary Evil. In Flinders and Mills (eds), Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives from the Field, 218--229. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• 5: Hugh Beyer , Karen Holtzblatt, Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1998
• 6: Button, G. 2000. The Ethnographic Tradition and Design. Design Studies, 21, 319--332.
• 7: Campbell, D. T. 1969. Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fishscale Model of Omniscience. In: Sherif and Sherif (eds), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences, 328--348. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
• 8: Clifford, C. 1983. On Ethnographic Authority. Representations, 2, 118--146.
• 9: Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• 10: Cypher, A. 1993. Watch What I Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• 11: Dourish, P. and Button, G. 1998. On Technomethodology: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and Systems Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395--432.
• 12: Diana E. Forsythe, ’’It‘s Just a Matter of Common Sense‘‘: Ethnography as Invisible Work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.8 n.1-2, p.127-145, Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1008692231284]
• 13: Frost, P. and Stablien, R. (eds). 1992. Doing Exemplary Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• 14: Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
• 15: Bill Gaver , Tony Dunne , Elena Pacenti, Design: Cultural probes, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.21-29, Jan./Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/291224.291235]
• 16: Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford University Press.
• 17: Geertz, C. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton University Press.
• 18: Geiryn, T. 1983. Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 781--795.
• 19: Jonathan Grudin, The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.261-268, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/97243.97284]
• 20: Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. 1997. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California.
• 21: Hill, R. 1995. Blackfellas and Whitefellas: Aboriginal Land Rights, The Mabo Decision, and the Meaning of Land. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 303--322.
• 22: Hughes, J., Randall, D., and Shapiro, D. 1993. From Ethnographic Record to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 123--141.
• 23: Hilary Hutchinson , Wendy Mackay , Bo Westerlund , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin , Catherine Plaisant , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon , Stéphane Conversy , Helen Evans , Heiko Hansen , Nicolas Roussel , Björn Eiderbäck, Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642616]
• 24: Kling, R., McKim, G., Fortuna, J. and King, A. 2000. Scientific Collaboratories as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Theoretical Approach. American Conference on Information Systems.
• 25: Levi-Strauss, C. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
• 26: Wendy E. Mackay, Patterns of sharing customizable software, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.209-221, October 07-10, 1990, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/99332.99356]
• 27: Allan MacLean , Kathleen Carter , Lennart Lövstrand , Thomas Moran, User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.175-182, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/97243.97271]
• 28: Malinowski, B. 1967. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.
• 29: Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95--117.
• 30: Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 31: Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.
• 32: Bonnie A. Nardi, A small matter of programming: perspectives on end user computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993
• 33: Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., and Ramage, M. 1995. What are Workplace Studies For? Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• 34: Povinelli, E. 1995. Do Rocks Listen? The Cultural Politics of Apprehending Aboriginal Labor. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 505--518.
• 35: Rogers, Y. 1997. Reconfiguring the Social Scientist: Shifting from Telling Designers What to Do to Getting More Involved. In Bowker et al., Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. London: Erlbaum.
• 36: Schmidt, K. 2000. The Critical Role of Workplace Studies in CSCW. In Heath, Hindmarsh, and Luff (eds), Workplace Studies: Rediscovering Work Practice and Informing Design. Cambridge University Press.
• 37: Suchman, L. 2002. Practice-Based Design of Information Systems: Notes from the Hyperdeveloped World. The Information Society, 18, 139--144.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

Keywords:
design, ethnography