ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping
Full text PdfPdf (629 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Multidisplay environments table of contents
Pages: 299 - 308  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-372-7
Authors
Pourang Irani  University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Carl Gutwin  University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Xing Dong Yang  University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 134,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124818
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many systems provide the user with a limited viewport of a larger graphical workspace. In these systems, the user often needs to find and select targets that are in the workspace, but not visible in the current view. Standard methods for navigating to the off-screen targets include scrolling, panning, and zooming; however, these are laborious when users cannot see a target's direction or distance. Techniques such as halos can provide awareness of targets, but actually getting to the target is still slow with standard navigation. To improve off-screen target selection, we developed a new technique called hop, which combines halos with a teleportation mechanism that shows proxies of distant objects. Hop provides both awareness of off-screen targets and fast navigation to the target context. A study showed that users are significantly faster at selecting off-screen targets with hopping than with two-level zooming or grab-and-drag panning, and it is clear that hop will be faster than either halos or proxy-based techniques (like drag-and-pop or vacuum filtering) by themselves. Hop both improves on halo-based navigation and extends the value of proxies to small-screen environments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P., Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. (2003). Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems. Proc. Interact'03, 57--64.
3
4
5
6
7
8
 
9
Cockburn, A. and Savage, J. (2003). Comparing Speed-Dependent Automatic Zooming with Traditional Scroll, Pan and Zoom Methods. Proc. CHI'03, 87--102.
10
 
11
12
13
14
 
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
 
28

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pourang Irani: colleagues
Carl Gutwin: colleagues
Xing Dong Yang: colleagues