| Through the looking glass: reflections on using undergraduate teaching assistants in CS1 |
| Full text |
Pdf
(81 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
archive
Volume 38 , Issue 1 (March 2006)
table of contents
SESSION: Classroom management
table of contents
Pages: 46 - 50
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0097-8418
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 23, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.
ABSTRACT
Over the last several years, there have been reports of many institutions using undergraduate students as teaching assistants (UTAs) in the classroom for CS1 as well as other courses in the curriculum. The literature has shown successes over a wide range of class sizes and UTA responsibilities. At University at Buffalo, we have been using undergraduates as teaching assistants in our CS1 course since Spring 2002, and have been impressed with the results. Throughout the deployment of the UTA program, the instructors of CS1 have observed that when UTAs are utilized in the classroom, both the students and the UTAs themselves benefit from their interactions. The UTAs have also become actively involved in providing feedback about the course design and have been suggesting improvements to assignments and in-class examples. They have also been involved in the process to hire new UTAs to replace those that are graduating. We have observed that such interactions have improved the UTAs sense of investment and ownership in the CS1 course.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
Carl Alphonce , Phil Ventura, Using graphics to support the teaching of fundamental object-oriented principles in CS1, Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 26-30, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/949344.949391]
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Joan Peckham , Lisa DiPippo , James Reynolds , Jake Paris , Phil Monte , Peter Constantinidis, A first course in computer science: the discipline is more than programming, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.15 n.5, p.220-227, May 2000
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Eric Roberts , John Lilly , Bryan Rollins, Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: an update on the Stanford experience, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.48-52, March 02-04, 1995, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
|
| |
10
|
Urban-Lurain, M., Teaching FITness for conceptual understanding: A computer science course for non-computer science majors, in Presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association (AERA). 2001.
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
Deborah Walters , Carl Alphonce , Barbara Sherman , Debra Burhans , Helene Kershner, Increasing learning and decreasing costs in a computer fluency course, Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 24-28, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark
|
|