|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we consider online auction mechanisms for the allocation of M items that are identical to each other except for the fact that they have different expiration times, and each item must be allocated before it expires. Players arrive at different times, and wish to buy one item before their deadline. The main difficulty is that players act "selfishly" and may mis-report their values, deadlines, or arrival times. We begin by showing that the usual notion of truthfulness (where players follow a single dominant strategy) cannot be used in this case, since any (deterministic) truthful auction cannot obtain better than an M-approximation of the social welfare. Therefore, instead of designing auctions in which players should follow a single strategy, we design two auctions that perform well under a wide class of selfish, "semi-myopic", strategies. For every combination of such strategies, the auction is associated with a different algorithm, and so we have a family of "semi-myopic" algorithms. We show that any algorithm in this family obtains a 3-approximation, and by this conclude that our auctions will perform well under any choice of such semi-myopic behaviors. We next turn to provide a game-theoretic justification for acting in such a semi-myopic way. We suggest a new notion of "Set-Nash" equilibrium, where we cannot pin-point a single best-response strategy, but rather only a set of possible best-response strategies. We show that our auctions have a Set-Nash equilibrium which is all semi-myopic, hence guarantees a 3-approximation. We believe that this notion is of independent interest.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Y. Bartal, F. Y. L. Chin, M. Chrobak, S. P. Y. Fung, W. Jawor, R. Lavi, J. Sgall, and T. Tichy. Online competitive algorithms for maximizing weighted through-put of unit jobs. In Proc. of the 21st Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, 2004.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Y. Bartal and R. Lavi. Analysis of the ß-opt algorithm, 2002. Unpublished manuscript.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
G. Demange, D. Gale, and M. Sotomayor. Multi-item auctions. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):863--872, 1986.
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
Amos Fiat , Andrew V. Goldberg , Jason D. Hartline , Anna R. Karlin, Competitive generalized auctions, Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 19-21, 2002, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/509907.509921]
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
F. Gul and E. Stacchetti. The english auction with differentiated commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 92:66--95, 2000.
|
| |
15
|
B. Hajek. On the competitiveness of on-line scheduling of unit-length packets with hard deadlines in slotted time. In Proc. of the 2001 Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2001.
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Alexander Kesselman , Zvi Lotker , Yishay Mansour , Boaz Patt-Shamir , Baruch Schieber , Maxim Sviridenko, Buffer overflow management in QoS switches, Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.520-529, July 2001, Hersonissos, Greece
[doi> 10.1145/380752.380847]
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
R. Lavi and N. Nisan. Online ascending auctions for gradually expiring items, 2004. http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~tron/papers/online-ascending.ps.
|
 |
22
|
Benny Lehmann , Daniel Lehmann , Noam Nisan, Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, p.18-28, October 14-17, 2001, Tampa, Florida, USA
[doi> 10.1145/501158.501161]
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford university press, 1995.
|
| |
25
|
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior, 35:166--196, 2001.
|
 |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
M. P. Wellman, W. E. Walsh, P. R. Wurman, and J. K. MacKie-Mason. Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior, 35:271--303, 2001.
|
CITED BY 18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikhil Bansal , Ning Chen , Neva Cherniavsky , Atri Rudra , Baruch Schieber , Maxim Sviridenko, Dynamic pricing for impatient bidders, Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.726-735, January 07-09, 2007, New Orleans, Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moshe Babaioff , Nicole Immorlica , Robert Kleinberg, Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms, Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.434-443, January 07-09, 2007, New Orleans, Louisiana
|
|
|
Moshe Babaioff , Michael Dinitz , Anupam Gupta , Nicole Immorlica , Kunal Talwar, Secretary problems: weights and discounts, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, p.1245-1254, January 04-06, 2009, New York, New York
|
|
|
Anirban Dasgupta , Arpita Ghosh , Hamid Nazerzadeh , Prabhakar Raghavan, Online story scheduling in web advertising, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, p.1275-1284, January 04-06, 2009, New York, New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi , Robert Kleinberg , Tuomas Sandholm, Automated online mechanism design and prophet inequalities, Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence, p.58-65, July 22-26, 2007, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|