ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
An optimal online algorithm for packet scheduling with agreeable deadlines
Full text PdfPdf (236 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia
SESSION: Session 8C table of contents
Pages: 801 - 802  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-89871-585-7
Authors
Fei Li  Columbia U.
Jay Sethuraman  Columbia U.
Clifford Stein  Columbia U.
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 57,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

An important issue in IP-based QoS networks is the effective management of packets at the router level. Specifically, if the arriving packets cannot all be stored in a buffer, or if the packets have deadlines by which they must be delivered, the router needs to identify the packets that should be dropped. In recent work, Kesselman et al. [6] propose a model, called buffer management with bounded delay, which can be thought of as an online scheduling problem on a single machine: packets arrive at a network switch and are stored in a buffer of size B. Each packet has a positive weight and a deadline, with the weight representing the value of transmitting the packet by its deadline. At each integer time step, exactly one packet can be transmitted, and the objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. If B = ∞, this is the online version of the scheduling problem 1| pj = 1, rj, djwj Uj. (We assume that rj and dj are integers.)


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Y. Bartal, F. Y. L. Chin, M. Chrobak, S. P. Y. Fung, W. Jawor, R. Lavi, J. Sgall, and T. Tichy, Online Competitive Algorithms for Maximizing Weighted Throughput of Unit Jobs, 21st Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pp.190 -- 210, 2004.
 
3
M. Chrobak, W. Jawor, J. Sgall, and T. Tichy, Improved Online Algorithms for Buffer Management in QoS Switches, ESA 2004.
 
4
F. Y. L. Chin and S. P. Y. Fung, Online Scheduling with Partial Job Values: Does Timesharing or Randomization Help?, Algorithmica, 2003.
 
5
B. Hajek, On the Competitiveness of Online Scheduling of Unit-Length Packets with Hard Deadlines in Slotted Time, Proceedings of 2001 Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, The John Hopkins U., 2001.
6

CITED BY  9
Collaborative Colleagues:
Fei Li: colleagues
Jay Sethuraman: colleagues
Clifford Stein: colleagues