ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Assessing students' knowledge: oral exams vs. written tests
Full text PdfPdf (157 KB)
Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Caparica, Portugal
SESSION: Assessment table of contents
Pages: 143 - 147  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-024-8
Also published in ...
Author
Hasmik Gharibyan  California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1067445.1067487
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

The evaluation of students' knowledge is undeniably a very important aspect in the process of education. Two of the most commonly used assessment methods are oral exams and written tests. In the USA in Computer Science Education the preference is generally given to written tests. Although convenient in many ways and effective for many subjects, written tests do not always provide correct evaluation of students' knowledge when it comes to theoretical subjects. In this paper we concentrate on theoretical courses of Computer Science. For these courses we conclude that an oral exam is a better evaluation method; we analyze the challenges instructors face when preparing and grading written tests, we discuss the problems students encounter when taking written tests, and we show the advantages of oral exams over written tests. However, we do not overlook some concerns with oral exams; we talk about these issues and advise the examiner to be aware and considerate of them.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ascher, C. Testing Students in Urban Schools: Current Problems and New Directions. ERIC/CUE Urban Diversity Series No.100. New York: Clearinghouse on Urban Education, Teachers College, Columbia University (ED 322 283), 1990.
 
2
Ashworth, P., Bannister, P. and Thorne, P. Guilty in Whose Eyes? University Student's Perceptions of Cheating and Plagiarism in Academic Work and Assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22/2 1997, 187--203.
 
3
Educate America: A Call for Equity in School Reform. Student Assessment and Testing. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory, September 2001. http://www.nwrel.org/cnorse/booklets/educate/11.html
 
4
Hawley, C. The Thieves of academe: Plagiarism in the University System. Improving college and university teaching, 32/1 1984, 35--39.
 
5
Naramark, S. and Naline, M. Academic Dishonesty among College Students. Issues in Education. Report of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington DC, August 1993.
 
6
What the Research Says About Student Assessment. Improving America's School: A Newsletter on Issues in School Reform, Spring 1996. http://www.ed.gov/pubs/IASA/newsletters/assess/pt4.html