ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Stencils-based tutorials: design and evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (481 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Educational & help systems table of contents
Pages: 541 - 550  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-998-5
Authors
Caitlin Kelleher  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Randy Pausch  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 200,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055047
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Users of traditional tutorials and help systems often have difficulty finding the components described or pictured in the procedural instructions. Users also unintentionally miss steps, and perform actions that the documentation's authors did not intend, moving the application into an unknown state. We introduce Stencils, an interaction technique for presenting tutorials that uses translucent colored stencils containing holes that direct the user's attention to the correct interface component and prevent the user from interacting with other components. Sticky notes on the stencil's surface provide necessary tutorial material in the context of the application. In a user study comparing a Stencils-based and paper-based version of the same tutorial in Alice, a complex software application designed to teach introductory computer programming, we found that users of a Stencils-based tutorial were able complete the tutorial 26% faster, with fewer errors, and less reliance on human assistance. Users of the Stencils-based and paper-based tutorials attained statistically similar levels of learning.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alice. http://www.alice.org
2
 
3
Bartlett, J. Transparent Controls for Interactive Graphics. WRL Technical Note TN-30, Digital Equipment Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, July 1992.
4
5
 
6
Booher, H.R., Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions. Human Factors 17, 3 (1975), 266--277.
7
 
8
 
9
Carroll, J., Smith-Kerker, P., Ford, J., and Mazur, S. The Minimal Manual. IBM RC 11637, 1986.
10
11
 
12
Dann, W., Cooper, S. and Pausch, R. Learning to Program with Alice: Beta Version. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005.
 
13
Designing Coachmarks. http://www.developer.apple.com/techpubs/mac/AppleGuide/AppleGuide-24.html
 
14
15
16
 
17
Guzdial, M. Software-Realized Scaffolding to Facilitate Programming for Science Learning. Interactive Learning Environments 4, 1 (1995), 1--44.
 
18
19
 
20
21
22
23
24
 
25
26
27
 
28
Schneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer 16, 8 (1983), 57--69.
 
29
Selker, T., Barber, R., and Kelley, R. Effective, Selective Presentation of Help Material in a Graphical Environment: Experience with COACH/2, a graphical adaptive help system. IBM Tech Report, 1996.
 
30
Shashaani, L. Gender-Differences in Computer Experience and its Influence on Computer Attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11, 4 (1994), 347--367.
31
32
 
33
 
34
Windows Family. http://www.windows.com.

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Caitlin Kelleher: colleagues
Randy Pausch: colleagues