ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A probabilistic framework for semi-supervised clustering
Full text PdfPdf (188 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Research track papers table of contents
Pages: 59 - 68  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-888-1
Authors
Sugato Basu  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Mikhail Bilenko  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Raymond J. Mooney  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 277,   Citation Count: 53
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1014052.1014062
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Unsupervised clustering can be significantly improved using supervision in the form of pairwise constraints, i.e., pairs of instances labeled as belonging to same or different clusters. In recent years, a number of algorithms have been proposed for enhancing clustering quality by employing such supervision. Such methods use the constraints to either modify the objective function, or to learn the distance measure. We propose a probabilistic model for semi-supervised clustering based on Hidden Markov Random Fields (HMRFs) that provides a principled framework for incorporating supervision into prototype-based clustering. The model generalizes a previous approach that combines constraints and Euclidean distance learning, and allows the use of a broad range of clustering distortion measures, including Bregman divergences (e.g., Euclidean distance and I-divergence) and directional similarity measures (e.g., cosine similarity). We present an algorithm that performs partitional semi-supervised clustering of data by minimizing an objective function derived from the posterior energy of the HMRF model. Experimental results on several text data sets demonstrate the advantages of the proposed framework.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
A. Banerjee, S. Merugu, I. S. Dhillon, and J. Ghosh. Clustering with Bregman divergences. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM-04), 2004.
 
4
 
5
A. Bar-Hillel, T. Hertz, N. Shental, and D. Weinshall. Learning distance functions using equivalence relations. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03), pages 11--18, 2003.
 
6
 
7
S. Basu, A. Banerjee, and R. J. Mooney. Active semi-supervision for pairwise constrained clustering. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM-04), 2004.
 
8
 
9
J. Besag. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 48(3):259--302, 1986.
10
11
 
12
 
13
D. Cohn, R. Caruana, and A. McCallum. Semi-supervised clustering with user feedback. Technical Report TR2003-1892, Cornell University, 2003.
 
14
 
15
A. Demiriz, K. P. Bennett, and M. J. Embrechts. Semi-supervised clustering using genetic algorithms. In Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering (ANNIE-99), pages 809--814, 1999.
 
16
A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39:1--38, 1977.
 
17
 
18
 
19
B. E. Dom. An information-theoretic external cluster-validity measure. Research Report RJ 10219, IBM, 2001.
 
20
M. B. Eisen, P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95:14863--14848, 1998.
 
21
S. Geman and D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6:721--742, 1984.
 
22
J. M. Hammersley and P. Clifford. Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices. Unpublished manuscript, 1971.
 
23
D. Hochbaum and D. Shmoys. A best possible heuristic for the k-center problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10(2):180--184, 1985.
 
24
 
25
S. D. Kamvar, D. Klein, and C. D. Manning. Spectral learning. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), pages 561--566, 2003.
 
26
M. Kearns, Y. Mansour, and A. Y. Ng. An information-theoretic analysis of hard and soft assignment methods for clustering. In Proceedings of 13th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-97), pages 282--293, 1997.
 
27
 
28
 
29
J. MacQueen. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pages 281--297, 1967.
 
30
E. M. Marcotte, I. Xenarios, A. van der Bliek, and D. Eisenberg. Localizing proteins in the cell from their phylogenetic profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97:12115--20, 2000.
 
31
K. V. Mardia and P. Jupp. Directional Statistics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2nd edition, 2000.
 
32
 
33
 
34
 
35
 
36
E. Segal, H. Wang, and D. Koller. Discovering molecular pathways from protein interaction and gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 19:i264--i272, July 2003.
 
37
A. Strehl, J. Ghosh, and R. Mooney. Impact of similarity measures on web-page clustering. In AAAI 2000 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Web Search, pages 58--64, July 2000.
 
38
 
39
E. P. Xing, A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, and S. Russell. Distance metric learning, with application to clustering with side-information. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, pages 505--512, Cambridge, MA, 2003. MIT Press.
 
40
Y. Zhang, M. Brady, and S. Smith. Hidden Markov random field model and segmentation of brain MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20(1):45--57, 2001.

CITED BY  54

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sugato Basu: colleagues
Mikhail Bilenko: colleagues
Raymond J. Mooney: colleagues