ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
The impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide
Full text HtmlHtml (27 KB),  PdfPdf (128 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 47 ,  Issue 7  (July 2004) table of contents
Has the Internet become indispensable?
Pages: 43 - 47  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Linda A. Jackson  Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Alexander von Eye  Michigan State University
Gretchen Barbatsis  Michigan State University
Frank Biocca  Michigan State University
Hiram E. Fitzgerald  Michigan State University
Yong Zhao  Michigan State University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 207,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1005817.1005819
What is a DOI?

Warning: The download time has expired please click on the item to try again.


ABSTRACT

Exploring factors influencing the social impact of Internet use.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., and Smith, H. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999), 276--302.
 
2
Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P. Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science 280 (1998), 390--391.
 
3
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., and Crawford, A. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58 (2001), 49--74.
4
 
5
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53 (1998), 1017--1032.
 
6
Pew Internet and American Life Project. Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. (2000); www.pewinternet.org/.
 
7
Shapiro, J.S. Loneliness: Paradox or artifact? American Psychologist 54 (1999), 782--783.
 
8
UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the digital future: Year 2. UCLA Center for Communication Policy. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, (2001); www.ccp.ucla.edu.
 
9
Weiser, E. B. The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4 (2002), 723--743.
 
10
Wellman, B., Quan, A., Witte, J., and Hampton, K. Does the Internet increase, decrease or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45 (2001), 12--23


Collaborative Colleagues:
Linda A. Jackson: colleagues
Alexander von Eye: colleagues
Gretchen Barbatsis: colleagues
Frank Biocca: colleagues
Hiram E. Fitzgerald: colleagues
Yong Zhao: colleagues