ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
SAKM: a scalable and adaptive key management approach for multicast communications
Full text PdfPdf (481 KB)
Source ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 2  (April 2004) table of contents
FEATURE: Full papers table of contents
Pages: 55 - 70  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:0146-4833
Authors
Yacine Challal  Compiegne University of Technology, Heudiasyc lab. France
Hatem Bettahar  Compiegne University of Technology, Heudiasyc lab. France
Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah  Compiegne University of Technology, Heudiasyc lab. France
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/997150.997157
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Multicasting is increasingly used as an efficient communication mechanism for group-oriented applications in the Internet. In order to offer secrecy for multicast applications, the traffic encryption key has to be changed whenever a user joins or leaves the system. Such a change has to be communicated to all the current users. The bandwidth used for such rekeying operation could be high when the group size is large. The proposed solutions to cope with this limitation, commonly called 1 affects n phenomenon, consist of organizing group members into subgroups that use independent traffic encryption keys. This kind of solutions introduce a new challenge which is the requirement of decrypting and reencrypting multicast messages whenever they pass from one subgroup to another. This is a serious drawback for applications that require real-time communication such as video-conferencing. In order to avoid the systematic decryption / reencryption of messages, we propose in this paper an adaptive solution which structures group members into clusters according to the application requirements in term of synchronization and the membership change behavior in the secure session. Simulation results show that our solution is efficient and typically adaptive compared to other schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
K. Almeroth and M. Ammar. Multicast group behaviour in the internet's multicast backbone (Mbone). IEEE communications Magazine, 1997.
 
3
D. Balenson, D. McGrew, and A. Sherman. Key Management for Large Dynamic Groups : One-Way Function Trees and Amortized Initialization. draft-balenson-groupkeymgmt-oft-00.txt, February 1999. Internet-Draft.
 
4
 
5
R. Canetti and B. Pinkas. A Taxonomy of Multicast Security Issues, April 1999. Internet draft.
 
6
 
7
Kin-Ching Chan and S.-H. Gary Chan. Distributed Servers Approach for Large-Scale Secure Multicast. The IEEE Journal On Selected Areas in Communications, 20(8):1500:1510, October 2002.
8
 
9
Wei Dai. Comparison of popular cryptographic algorithms. http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/benchmarks.html, 2000.
10
 
11
Lakshminath R. Dondeti, Sarit Mukherjee, and Ashok Samal. Comparison of Hierarchical Key Distribution Schemes. IEEE Globcom Global Internet Symposium, 1999.
 
12
Lakshminath R. Dondeti, Sarit Mukherjee, and Ashok Samal. Survey and Comparison of Secure Group Communication Protocols, 1999. Technical Report.
 
13
Lakshminath R. Dondeti, Sarit Mukherjee, and Ashok Samal. Scalable secure one-to-many group communication using dual encryption. Computer Communications, 2000.
 
14
W. Fenner. Internet Group Management Protocol, version 2, November 1997. RFC 2236.
 
15
Thomas Hardjono and Gene Tsudik. IP Multicast Security : Issues and Directions. Annales de telecom, 2000.
 
16
H. Harney and C. Muckenhirn. Group Key Management Protocol (GKMP) Architecture, July 1997. RFC 2093.
 
17
H. Harney and C. Muckenhirn. Group Key Management Protocol (GKMP) Specification, July 1997. RFC 2094.
 
18
Paul Judge and Mostafa Ammar. Security Issues and Solutions in Multicast Content Distribution: A Survey. IEEE Network, pages 30--36, January/February 2003.
 
19
Leonard Kleinrock. Queueing Systems. John Wiley & Sons, January 1975.
20
 
21
 
22
Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Data Encryption Standard (DES), December 1993. FIPS PUB 46.
 
23
Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Digital Signature Standard (DSS), May 1994. FIPS PUB 186.
 
24
Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), November 2001. FIPS PUB 197.
25
26
 
27
28
 
29
Jack Snoeyink, Subhash Suri, and George Vorghese. A Lower Bound for Multicast Key Distribution. IEEE INFOCOM'01, 2001.
 
30
M. Waldvogel, G. Caronni, D. Sun, N. Weiler, and B. Plattner. The VersaKey Framework : Versatile Group Key Management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (Special Issues on Middleware), 17(8):1614--1631, August 1999.
 
31
D. Wallner, E. Harder, and R. Agee. Key Management for Multicast : Issues and Architecture. National Security Agency, June 1999. RFC 2627.
32
 
33


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yacine Challal: colleagues
Hatem Bettahar: colleagues
Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah: colleagues