A novel approach for flexible and consistent ADL-driven ASIP design

ABSTRACT

Architecture description languages (ADL) have been established to aid the design of application-specific instruction-set processors (ASIP). Their main contribution is the automatic generation of a software toolkit, including C compiler, assembler, linker, and instruction-set simulator. Hence, the challenge in the design of such ADLs is to unambiguously capture the architectural information required for the toolkit generation in a single model. This is particularly difficult for C compiler and simulator, as both require information about the instructions' semantics, however, while the C compiler needs to know what an instructions does, the simulator needs to know how. Existing ADLs solve this problem by either introducing redundancy or by limiting the language's flexibility.This paper presents a novel, mixed-level approach for ADL-based instruction-set description, which offers maximum flexibility while preventing from inconsistencies. Moreover, it enables capturing instruction- and cycle-accurate descriptions in a single model. The feasibility and design efficiency of our approach is demonstrated with a number of contemporary, real-world processor architectures.

REFERENCES

• 1: Axys Design Automation. http://www.axysdesign.com.
• 2: Coware, Inc. http://www.coware.com.
• 3: Tensilica. http://www.tensilica.com.
• 4: Ashok Halambi , Peter Grun , Vijay Ganesh , Asheesh Khare , Nikil Dutt , Alex Nicolau, EXPRESSION: a language for architecture exploration through compiler/simulator retargetability, Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, p.100-es, January 1999, Munich, Germany [doi>10.1145/307418.307549]
• 5: A. Hoffmann, T. Kogel et al. A Novel Methodology for the Design of Application-Specific Instruction-Set Processors (ASIP) using a Machine Description Language. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, Nov. 2001.
• 6: George Hadjiyiannis , Silvina Hanono , Srinivas Devadas, ISDL: an instruction set description language for retargetability, Proceedings of the 34th annual conference on Design automation, p.299-302, June 09-13, 1997, Anaheim, California, United States [doi>10.1145/266021.266108]
• 7: F. Homewood and P. Faraboschi. ST200: A VLIW Architecture for Media-Oriented Applications. Microprocessor Forum, Oct. 2000.
• 8: Mark R. Hartoog , James A. Rowson , Prakash D. Reddy , Soumya Desai , Douglas D. Dunlop , Edwin A. Harcourt , Neeti Khullar, Generation of software tools from processor descriptions for hardware/software codesign, Proceedings of the 34th annual conference on Design automation, p.303-306, June 09-13, 1997, Anaheim, California, United States [doi>10.1145/266021.266110]
• 9: PEAS-III: An ASIP Design Environment, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers & Processors, p.430, September 17-20, 2000
• 10: Prabhat Mishra , Nikil Dutt , Alex Nicolau, Functional abstraction driven design space exploration of heterogeneous programmable architectures, Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on Systems synthesis, September 30-October 03, 2001, Montréal, P.Q., Canada [doi>10.1145/500001.500061]
• 11: X. Nie and L. Gazsi. A New Network Processor Architecture for High-Speed Communications. In Proc. of the SIPS, 1999.
• 12: Achim Nohl , Gunnar Braun , Oliver Schliebusch , Rainer Leupers , Heinrich Meyr , Andreas Hoffmann, A universal technique for fast and flexible instruction-set architecture simulation, Proceedings of the 39th conference on Design automation, June 10-14, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/513918.513927]
• 13: Achim Nohl , Volker Greive , Gunnar Braun , Andreas Andreas , Rainer Leupers , Oliver Schliebusch , Heinrich Meyr, Instruction encoding synthesis for architecture exploration using hierarchical processor models, Proceedings of the 40th conference on Design automation, June 02-06, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/775832.775898]
• 14: Ricardo E. Gonzalez, Xtensa: A Configurable and Extensible Processor, IEEE Micro, v.20 n.2, p.60-70, March 2000 [doi>10.1109/40.848473]
• 15: S. Bashford, R. Leupers et al. The MIMOLA Language, Version 4.1. Reference Manual, Department of Computer Science, University of Dortmund, 1994.
• 16: Oliver Schliebusch , Andreas Hoffmann , Achim Nohl , Gunnar Braun , Heinrich Meyr, Architecture Implementation Using the Machine Description Language LISA, Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Asia South Pacific design automation/VLSI Design, p.239, January 07-11, 2002
• 17: S. Weber, K. Keutzer et al. Multi-View Operation-Level Design -- Supporting the Design of Irregular ASIPs. Technical Report UCB/ERL M03/12, UC Berkeley, Apr. 2003.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.0 GENERAL
      Subjects: Modeling of computer architecture

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
      D.3.2 Language Classifications
          Subjects: Design languages

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.5 Model Development
          Subjects: Modeling methodologies

  J. Computer Applications
  J.6 COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING
      Subjects: Computer-aided design (CAD)

General Terms:
Design, Languages

Keywords:
ADL, ASIP, embedded processors