ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selective gate-length biasing for cost-effective runtime leakage control
Full text PdfPdf (90 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Design for manufacturing table of contents
Pages: 327 - 330  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-828-8
Authors
Puneet Gupta  University of California at San Diego, CA
Andrew B. Kahng  University of California at San Diego, CA
Puneet Sharma  University of California at San Diego, CA
Dennis Sylvester  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996566.996661
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

With process scaling, leakage power reduction has become one of the most important design concerns. Multi-threshold techniques have been used to reduce runtime leakage power without sacrificing performance. In this paper, we propose small biases of transistor gate-length to further minimize power in a manufacturable manner. Unlike multi-V th techniques, gate-length biasing requires no additional masks and may be performed at any stage in the design process.Our results show that gate-length biasing effectively reduces leakage power by up to 25% with less than 4% delay penalty. We show the feasibility of the technique in terms of manufacturability and pin-compatibility for post-layout power optimization. We also show up to 54% reduction in leakage uncertainty due to inter-die process variation in circuits when biased gate-lengths, versus only unbiased one, are used. Circuits selectively biased show much less sensitivity to both intra and inter die variations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
L.Wei,K.RoyandC.K.Koh,"PowerMinimizationbySimultaneous Dual-Vth Assignment and Gate-sizing", in Proc. CICC, 2000, pp. 413--416.
 
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
S. Kim, S. Kosonocky, W. Hwang, and Y. Shin, "Long-Term Power Minimization of Dual-Vth CMOS circuits", in IEEE Proc. ASIC/SOC, 2002, pp. 323--327.
 
9
 
10
M. Horiguchi, T. Sakata and K. Itoh, "Switched-Source-Impedance CMOS Circuit for Low Standby Sub-threshold Current Giga-Scale LSI's", in JSSC, 1993, pp. 1131--1135.
 
11
Y. Ye, S. Borkar and V. De, "A New Technique for Standby Leakage Reduction in High-Performance Circuits", in Proc. Symp. on VLSI Circuits, 1998, pp. 40--41.
 
12
S. Mutoh, T. Douseki, Y. Matsuya, T. Aoki and S. Shigematsu, "1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS", in JSSC, 1995, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 847--854.
13
 
14
S. Mutoh, S. Shigematsu, Y. Matsuya, H Fukada, T. Kaneko and J. Yamada, "1V Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS Digital Signal Processor for Mobile Phone Application", in JSSC, 1996, pp. 1795--1802.
 
15
S. Shigematsu, S. Mutoh, Y. Matsuya, Y. Tabae and J. Yamada, "A 1-V High-Speed MTCMOS Circuit Scheme for Power-Down Application Circuits", in JSSC, 1997, pp. 861--869.
 
16
Y. Oowaki et al., "A sub-0.1μm Circuit Design with Substrate-Over-Biasing", in ISSCC, 1998, pp. 88--89.
17
 
18
19
 
20
Y. Cao, P. Gupta, A.B. Kahng, D. Sylvester and J. Yang, "Design Sensitivities to Variability: Extrapolations and Assessments in Nanometer VLSI", Proc. ASIC/SOC, 2002, pp. 411--415.
21
 
22
ITRS 2003, http://public.itrs.net
 
23
S. Narendra, D. Blaauw, A. Devgan and F. Najm, "Leakage Issues in IC Design: Trends, Estimation and Avoidance", Proc. ICCAD (tutorial), 2003.
 
24
R. Puri, IBM Corporation, Personal Communication.
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Puneet Gupta: colleagues
Andrew B. Kahng: colleagues
Puneet Sharma: colleagues
Dennis Sylvester: colleagues