ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Leakage in nano-scale technologies: mechanisms, impact and design considerations
Full text PdfPdf (654 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Hot leakage table of contents
Pages: 6 - 11  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-828-8
Authors
Amit Agarwal  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Chris H. Kim  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Saibal Mukhopadhyay  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Kaushik Roy  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996566.996571
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The high leakage current in nano-meter regimes is becoming a significant portion of power dissipation in CMOS circuits as threshold voltage, channel length, and gate oxide thickness are scaled. Consequently, the identification of different leakage components is very important for estimation and reduction of leakage. Moreover, the increasing statistical variation in the process parameters has led to significant variation in the transistor leakage current across and within different dies. Designing with the worst case leakage may cause excessive guard-banding, resulting in a lower performance. This paper explores various intrinsic leakage mechanisms including weak inversion, gate-oxide tunneling and junction leakage etc. Various circuit level techniques to reduce leakage energy and their design trade-off are discussed. We also explore process variation compensating techniques to reduce delay and leakage spread, while meeting power constraint and yield.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Roy et al. Proceeding of IEEE, Feb, 2003.
 
2
 
3
K. A. Bowman et al. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, Feb 2002.
 
4
C. H. Kim et al. Symposium on VLSI Circuits, 2003.
 
5
S. Mukhopadhyay et al. Proceedings of DAC, 2003.
 
6
 
7
"Well-Tempered" Bulk-Si NMOSFET Device Home Page", Available: http://www-mtl.mit.edu/Well/
 
8
L. Wei et al. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 16,1999.
9
 
10
N. Sirisantana et al. Int. Conf. on Computer Design, 2000.
 
11
Y. Ye et al. IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, 1998.
 
12
Z. Chen et al. IEEE Int. Conf. on Comp. Aided Design, 1998.
 
13
S. Mukhopadhyay et al. IEEE Tran. on VLSI Systems, 2003.
 
14
M. C. Johnson et al. ACM/IEEE DAC, 1999.
 
15
S. Mutoh et al. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, 30, 1995.
16
 
17
H. Kawaguchi et al. ISSCC, 1998.
 
18
T. Kuroda et al. ISSCC 1996.
 
19
A. Keshavarzi et al. NASA Symp. on VLSI Design, 1999.
 
20
S. Narendra et al. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, May 2003.
 
21
C. H. Kim et al. ISLPED 2003.
 
22
H. Mizuno et al. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits., 34, 1999.
 
23
C. H. Kim et al. ACM/IEEE DATE, 2002.
 
24
K. Nose et al. IEEE Custom Integrated Circ. Conf., 93, 2001.
 
25
R. Rao, et al. IEEE Transaction on VLSI, Feb. 2004.
 
26
S. Mukhopadhyay, et al. ISLPED, 2003.
 
27
J. Tschanz et al. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Nov. 2002.
 
28
J. Tschanz et al. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, May 2003.
 
29
A. Alvandpour et al. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, May 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Amit Agarwal: colleagues
Chris H. Kim: colleagues
Saibal Mukhopadhyay: colleagues
Kaushik Roy: colleagues