ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations
Full text PdfPdf (487 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Tuscon, AZ, USA
SESSION: Supporting personalization table of contents
Pages: 349 - 357  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-832-6
Authors
Catherine C. Marshall  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA
A. J. Bernheim Brush  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 104,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996350.996432
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Today people typically read and annotate printed documents even if they are obtained from electronic sources like digital libraries If there is a reason for them to share these personal annotations online, they must re-enter them. Given the advent of better computer support for reading and annotation, including tablet interfaces, will people ever share their personal digital ink annotations as is, or will they make substantial changes to them? What can we do to anticipate and support the transition from personal to public annotations? To investigate these questions, we performed a study to characterize and compare students' personal annotations as they read assigned papers with those they shared with each other using an online system. By analyzing over 1, 700 annotations, we confirmed three hypotheses: (1) only a small fraction of annotations made while reading are directly related to those shared in discussion; (2) some types of annotations - those that consist of anchors in the text coupled with margin notes - are more apt to be the basis of public commentary than other types of annotations; and (3) personal annotations undergo dramatic changes when they are shared in discussion, both in content and in how they are anchored to the source document. We then use these findings to explore ways to support the transition from personal to public annotations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Brush, A., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A. and Gupta, A. Supporting Interaction Outside of Class. In Proceedings of CSCL '02 (Boulder, CO, USA, January 7-11 2002). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 2002, 425--434.
4
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
EPost, UW Catalyst Toolkit, http://www. catalyst.washington.edu/tools/
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
Marshall, C.C., Price, M.N., Golovchinsky, G., and Schilit, B.N. Collaborating over Portable Reading Appliances. Personal Technologies, 3, 1 (March, 1999), 43-53.
 
16
Microsoft Office Web Discussions, http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/2000/WebDiscussions.aspx
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
Shipman, F. M., Price, M. N., Marshall, C. C., Golovchinsky, G., and Schilit, B. N. Identifying Useful Passages in Documents Based on Annotation Patterns. In Proceedings of ECDL'03 (Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003). Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2003, 101--112.
 
24
Shum, S. B., and Sumner, T. JIME: An Interactive Journal for Interactive Media. First Monday, 6, 2 (February 5, 2001).

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Catherine C. Marshall: colleagues
A. J. Bernheim Brush: colleagues