ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital libraries and educational practice: a case for new models
Full text PdfPdf (200 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Tuscon, AZ, USA
SESSION: Educational aspects of digital libraries table of contents
Pages: 170 - 178  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-832-6
Authors
Tamara Sumner  University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO
Mary Marlino  University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 233,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996350.996389
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Educational digital libraries can benefit from theoretical and methodological approaches that enable lessons learned from design and evaluation projects performed in one particular setting to be applied to other settings within the library network. Three promising advances in design theory are reviewed - reference tasks, design experiments, and design genres. Each approach advocates the creation of 'intermediate' constructs as vehicles for knowledge building and knowledge sharing across design and research projects. One purpose of an intermediate construct is to formulate finer-grained models that describe and explain the relationship between key design features and the cognitive and social dimensions of the context of use. Three models are proposed and used as thought experiments to analyze the utility of these approaches to educational digital library design and evaluation: digital libraries as cognitive tools, component repositories, and knowledge networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AAAS Benchmarks for Science Literacy American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Washington DC, 1993.
 
2
Aivazian, B., Geary, E., Sumner, T., Khoo, M., and Ireton, S Serving K--12 Education with the Digital Water Education Library (DWEL) Knowledge Quest, 31 (3 (Jan/Feb)) 21--22.
 
3
Borgman, C. L. Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics, Fourth DELOS Workshop, Budapest, Hungary, 2002, 21.
 
4
 
5
Brown, A. L. Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2) 141--178.
 
6
Carroll, J. M. Design Rationale as Theory in Carroll, J. M. ed. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Towards a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2003, 431--461.
 
7
Carroll, J. M., HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Towards a Multidisciplinary Science Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2003.
 
8
Clark, R. E. Media Use in Education in Alkin, M. C. ed. Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Macmillan, New York, 1992, 805--814.
 
9
Cobb, P. Confrey, J. diSessa, A. Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. Design Experiments in Educational Research Educational Researcher, 32 (1) 9--13.
 
10
DLESE Digital Library for Earth System Education, www.dlese.org, National Science Foundation, 2000.
11
 
12
13
 
14
Fulker, D. and Janée, G. Components of an NSDL Architecture: Technical Scope and Functional Model NSDL Technical Report, 2002.
 
15
Kaput, J. J. and Roschelle, J. Connecting the Connectivity and the Component Revolutions to Deep Curriculum Reform, US Dept of Education's Office of Educational Technology, Washington, DC 2001, http://www.ed.gov/Technology/Futures/kaput.html
 
16
Keith, S. Blandford, A. and Fields, B. Tailoring Claims Analysis to the design and deployment of digital libraries: a case study, Interaction Design Centre, Middlesex University, London, 2003, 14.
17
 
18
 
19
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
 
20
Lynch, C. Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age ARL Bimonthly Report, Association of Research Libraries, 2003, 1--7.
 
21
MacDonald, J. and Mason, R. Information Handling Skills and Resource Based Learning, Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University (UK), 1999.
22
 
23
Mayer, R. and Moreno, R. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning Learning and Instruction, 12 107--119.
24
 
25
NSDL National Science Digital Library, www.nsdl.org, National Science Foundation, 2001.
 
26
NSDL National Science Digital Library Progress Report: Fall 2000 -- Summer 2003, NSDL, Boulder, CO, 2003, 29.
 
27
O'Donnell, A. M. Dansereau, D. F. and Hall, R. H. Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1 (March)) 71--86
 
28
Oliver, M and Harvey, J What does 'impact' mean in the evaluation of learning technology? Educational Technology & Society, 5 (3) http://ifets ieee org/periodical/vol_3_2002/oliver html
29
 
30
Rapp, D. N. Taylor, H. A. and Crane, G. R. The impact of digital libraries on cognitive processes: psychological issues of hypermedia Computers in Human Behavior, 19 609--628.
 
31
Recker, M. and Walker, A. Supporting 'word-of-mouth' social networks via collaborative information filtering Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14 (1) 79--98.
 
32
Recker, M. and Wiley, D. Instructional Architect, http://ia.usu.edu/, Utah State University, 2001.
 
33
Reeves, T. C. and Hedberg, J. G. Inquiry Paradigms and Evaluation Models in Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2003, 27--51.
 
34
Reeves, T. C. and Hedberg, J. G. Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2003.
 
35
Renninger, K. A. and Shumar, W. Community Building with and for Teachers at The Math Forum in Renninger, K. A. and Shumar, W eds Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002, 60--95.
36
 
37
RLG/OCLC Working Group Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repository: Meeting the Needs of Research Resources, The Research Libraries Group, Inc and the Online Computer Library Center, Mountain View, CA, 2001, 56.
 
38
 
39
Roschelle, J. Digiano, C. Roy, P. and Kaput, J. Educational Software Components of Tomorrow (ESCOT), http://www.escot org/, SRI International, 1998.
 
40
Saracevic, T. Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concepts Library Trends, 49 (3 (Fall)) 350--369.
 
41
Sloane, F. C. and Gorard, S. Exploring Modeling Aspects of Design Experiments Educational Researcher, 32 (1) 29--31.
 
42
Sumner, T. Marlino, M. and Butcher, K. Developing a Strategy for Evaluating the Educational Impact of NSDL, National Science Digital Library, Washington, DC 2003, 4.
 
43
Sumner, T. and Taylor, J. Media Integration through Meta-Learning Environments in Eisenstadt, M. and Vincent, T. eds. The Knowledge Web, Kogan Page, London, 1998, 63--78.
 
44
45
 
46
Sumner, T. R. Dawe, M. and Devaul, H. Creating Reusable Educational Components: Lessons from DLESE Journal of Geoscience Education, 50 (1 (January)) 25--30.
47
 
48
49
 
50
 
51
Whittaker, S. Terveen, L. and Nardi, B. Let's Stop Pushing the Envelope and Start Addressing It: A Reference Task Agenda for HCI Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2 & 3) 181--205.
52

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tamara Sumner: colleagues
Mary Marlino: colleagues