ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Shortest paths and loop-free routing in dynamic networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.08 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Communications architectures & protocols table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 177 - 187  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-405-8
Also published in ...
Author
B. Awerbuch  Dept. of Mathematics and Lab. for Computer Science, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/99508.99550
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we survey the existing methods for designing shortest paths routing algorithms for dynamic networks. We compare them based on worst-case communication and message complexity, and suggest new approach that yields a protocol with linear time and polynomial communication. The main idea behind our approach is to use a “dynamic synchronizer”, which transforms a dynamic asynchronous network into static synchronous one. We believe this is an important methodology in design and analysis of communication protocols, that can be applied to other problems as well.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
AAG87
Yehuda Afek, Baruch Awerbuch, and Eli G#fni. Applying static network protocols to dynamic networks. In 28th A nnz#al Symposium on Foundations of Computer Scier#ce. IEEE, October 1987.
 
AG87
 
AS88
Baruch Awerbuch #nd Michael Sipser. Dynamic networks are as fast as static networks. In 29tu Annual Symposium on Foundations o.f Computer Science, pages 206-220. IEEE, October 1988.
Awe85
CRKG89
 
DS80
Edsger W. Dijkstra and C. S. Scholten. Termination detectiol# for diffusirtg computations. lnfo. Process. Letters, 11(1):1-4, August 1980.
 
Fin79
Steven G. Finn. Resynch procedures #nd a fail-safe network protocol. 1EEE Trans. on Commun., COM-27(6):840-845, June 1979.
 
Fre85
 
Gal82
Robert G. Gallager. Distributed minimum hop algorithms. Technical Report LIDS-P-1175, MIT, Lab. for Information and Decision Systems, January 1982.
 
Gar89a
Gar89b
 
Hum81
Pierre A. Humblet. An adaptive distributed dijkstra shortest path algorithm. Technical Report CICS-P-60, Center for Intelligent Control Systems, MIT, May 19881.
 
Jaf8O
Jeffrey Jaffe. Using sign all il#g messages instead of clocks. Unpublished manuscript., 1980.
 
JM82
J. Jaffe and F. Moss. A responsive distributed routing protocol. 1EEE Trans. on Commun., COM-30(7, Part II):1758-1762, July 1982.
 
KT87
 
MRR80
John McQuillan, Ira Richer, and Eric Rosen. The new routing algorithm for the arpanet. IEEE Trans. on Commun., 28(5):711-719, May 1980.
 
MS79
P. Merlin and A. SegM1. Failsafe distributed routing protocol. IEEE Trans. on Commun., COM-27:1280-1288, September 1979.
RF89
 
Seg83
Adrian SegMl. Distributed network protocols. IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, IT-29(1):23-35, January 1983. Some details in technical report of szune name, MIT Lab. for Info. and Decision Syst., LIDS-P.1015; Technion Dept. EE, Publ. 414, July 1981.
 
SH87
Stuart R. Soloway and Pierre A. Humbler. On distributed network protocols for cha#,ging topologies. Technical Report LIDS-P-1564, MIT, Lab. for Information and Decision Systems, May 1987. Also have version from May 1986.
 
SS81
A. Segall and M. Sidi. A failsafe distributed protocol for minimum delay routing. IEEE Trans. on Commun., COM-29(5):689- 695, May 1981,
Taj77