ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Patterns of sharing customizable software
Full text PdfPdf (1.08 MB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 209 - 221  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-402-3
Author
Wendy E. Mackay  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E40-366, 1 Amherst Street, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 46
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/99332.99356
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The act of customizing software is generally viewed as a solitary activity that allows users to express individual preferences. In this study, users at two different research sites, working with two different kinds of customizable software, were found to actively share their customization files with each other. This sharing allowed the members of each organization to establish and perpetuate informally-defined norms of behavior. A small percentage of people within the organization were responsible for most of the sharing. One group of these were highly-skilled software engineers, who were usually the first to try new software. They used customization as a way to experiment with and learn about the software and made their files available to others through various broadcast mechanisms. This group did not try to determine whether their customizations were useful to other users. The second group were less skilled technically but much more interested in interpreting the needs of their colleagues and creating customization files tailored to those needs. They acted as translators between the highly technical group and the rest of the organization. The spontaneous sharing of customization files within an organization has implications for both organizations and for software designers. Managers should 1) recognize and support the role of translators, 2) recognize that not all sharing is beneficial, and 3) provide opportunities for the exchange of customization files and innovations among members of the organization. Software designers should 1) provide tools that allow users to evaluate the effectiveness of their customizations through reflective software, 2) provide well-tested examples of customization files with the first release of the software, 3) explicitly support sharing of customizations, and 4) provide tools to support the activities of translators.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Allen, T.j. (1972). Communication Networks in R&D Laboratories. R&D Management, pp. 14-21.
2
3
4
 
5
Champine, G. (1987). Project Athena as a Next Generation Educational Computing System.
6
7
8
 
9
Mackay, W.E. (May 1990). Users and Customizable Software: A Co-Adaptive Phenomenon. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14

CITED BY  46