ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 183 - 195  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-402-3
Authors
Christine M. Neuwirth  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
David S. Kaufer  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Ravinder Chandhok  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
James H. Morris  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 68
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/99332.99354
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on a project to develop a “work in preparation” editor, or PREP editor, to study co-authoring and commenting relationships. As part of the project, we have identified three issues in designing computer support for co-authoring and commenting: (1) support for social interaction among co-authors and commenters; (2) support for cognitive aspects of co-authoring and external commenting; and (3) support for practicality in both types of interaction. For each of these issues, the paper describes the approach the PREP editor takes to address them.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Agre89
 
APA83
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. APA, Washington, DC, 1983.
 
Brid87
Bridwell-Bowles, L. S., Johnson, P., & Brehe, S. Computers and composing: Case studies of experienced writers. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes., pp. 81-107. Norwood, NJ." Ablex, 1987.
Cara88
Catl89
Cook87
 
Cran72
Crane, D. The invisible college. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1972.
Deli86a
Deli87b
 
Edwa86
Edwards, M. R., Levine, J. A., & Kurland, D. M. ForComment. Broderbund, 1986.
Ehrl87
Fish88
 
Flow81
Flower, L. and Hayes, J. R. The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English 15:229-243, October, 1981.
 
Flow89
Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Carey, L., Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process. Technical Report 34, Center for the Study of Writing, Carnegie Mellon University, July, 1989.
 
Gere87
Gere, A.R. Writing groups: History, theory and implications. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1987.
 
Goul88
Gould, J. D. How to design usable systems. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
Grei87
Grud88
 
Haas89
Haas, C. How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23 (2):181-207, May, 1989.
Hala87
Hala87a
 
Hartms
Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Manuscript under review.
 
Haye80
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, I-Iillsdale, N.J., 1980.
 
Haye87
Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Volume H: Reading, writing, and language processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987.
 
Iris89
 
Kauf86
Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English 20(2):121-140, May, 1986.
 
Kaufms
Kaufer, D. K., & Carley, C. Interaction at a distance, ms.
Klin80
 
Krau87
Krant, R. E., Galegher, j., & Egido, C. Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction 3:31-58, 1987.
Lela88
 
Luns90
Lunsford, A., &Ede, L. Singular texts~plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1990.
Malo85
 
Malo88
Malone, T. W. What is coordination theory? in Coordination Theory Workshop. National Science Foundation, Feb., 1988.
Meyr86
Neuw87
 
Neuw88
Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Keim, G., & GiUespie, T. The Comments program: Computer support for response to writing. CECE-TR-3, Center for Educational Computing in English, English Department, Carnegie Mellon University, January, 1988.
Neuw89
 
Neuw89a
Neuwirth, C. M., Palmquist, M., & Gillespie, T. Role playing in peer review: The Devil's Advocate exercise. In D. Beil (Ed.), Teacher's guide to using computer networks for written instruction, pp. 157-164. Realtime Learning Systems, Washington, DC, 1989.
 
Norm86
Norman, D. A. Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User-centered system design, pp. 31-61. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.
Smit87
Smol87
Stef87
Tang88

CITED BY  68

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christine M. Neuwirth: colleagues
David S. Kaufer: colleagues
Ravinder Chandhok: colleagues
James H. Morris: colleagues