ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using trust and risk in role-based access control policies
Full text PdfPdf (222 KB)
Source Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
SESSION: Access management for distributed systems table of contents
Pages: 156 - 162  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-872-5
Authors
Nathan Dimmock  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
András Belokosztolszki  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
David Eyers  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Jean Bacon  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Ken Moody  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): ,   Downloads (12 Months): ,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/990036.990062
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Emerging trust and risk management systems provide a framework for principals to determine whether they will exchange resources, without requiring a complete definition of their credentials and intentions. Most distributed access control architectures have far more rigid policy rules, yet in many respects aim to solve a similar problem. This paper elucidates the similarities between trust management and distributed access control systems by demonstrating how the OASIS access control system and its rôle-based policy language can be extended to make decisions on the basis of trust and risk analyses rather than on the basis of credentials alone. We apply our new model to the prototypical example of a file storage and publication service for the Grid, and test it using our Prolog-based OASIS implementation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Ashton Applewhite. Getting the Grid. IEEE Distributed Systems Online, May 2002.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
Marco Carbone, Mogens Nielsen, and Vladimiro Sassone. A formal model for trust in dynamic networks. Research Series RS-03-04, BRICS, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, January 2003. EU Project SECURE IST-2001-32486 Deliverable 1.1.
 
8
 
9
Tyrone Grandison and Morris Sloman. A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Society, Surveys and Tutorials, 3(4), 2000.
 
10
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 Working Group. ISO/IEC 9899 - Programming languages - C, 1999.
 
11
 
12
Audun Jøsang, Elizabeth Gray, and Michael Kinateder. Analysing topologies of transitive trust. In Proceedings of the Workshop of Formal Aspects of Security and Trust (FAST), September 2003.
 
13
 
14
 
15
Jean-Marc Seigneur, Stephen Farrell, Christian Damsgaard Jensen, Elizabeth Gray, and Chen Yong. End-to-end trust in pervasive computing starts with recognition. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing, 2003.
 
16
Li Xiong and Ling Liu. Building trust in decentralized peer-to-peer electronic communities. In The 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce Research, October 2002.
 
17
Walt Teh-Ming Yao. Fidelis: A policy-driven trust management framework. In Proc. of the 1st Intern'l Conf. on Trust Management, number 2692 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag, May 2003.
18
 
19

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nathan Dimmock: colleagues
András Belokosztolszki: colleagues
David Eyers: colleagues
Jean Bacon: colleagues
Ken Moody: colleagues