ValueCharts: analyzing linear models expressing preferences and evaluations

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose ValueCharts, a set of visualizations and interactive techniques intended to support decision-makers in inspecting linear models of preferences and evaluation. Linear models are popular decision-making tools for individuals, groups and organizations. In Decision Analysis, they help the decision-maker analyze preferential choices under conflicting objectives. In Economics and the Social Sciences, similar models are devised to rank entities according to an evaluative index of interest. The fundamental goal of building models expressing preferences and evaluations is to help the decision-maker organize all the information relevant to a decision into a structure that can be effectively analyzed. However, as models and their domain of application grow in complexity, model analysis can become a very challenging task. We claim that ValueCharts will make the inspection and application of these models more natural and effective. We support our claim by showing how ValueCharts effectively enable a set of basic tasks that we argue are at the core of analyzing and understanding linear models of preferences and evaluation.

REFERENCES

• 1: Asahi, T., D. Turo, and B. Shneiderman, Using Treemaps to visualize the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Information Systems Research, 1995. 6(4): p. 357--375.
• 2: Jim Blythe, Visual exploration and incremental utility elicitation, Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence, p.526-532, July 28-August 01, 2002, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
• 3: Jacques Bertin, Semiology of graphics, University of Wisconsin Press, 1983
• 4: Stuart K. Card , Jock D. Mackinlay , Ben Shneiderman, Readings in information visualization: using vision to think, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1999
• 5: Clemen, R. T., Making Hard Decisions: an introduction to decision analysis. 1996, Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.
• 6: J. S. Dyer, Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, v.36 n.3, p.249-258, Mar. 1990 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249]
• 7: Hammond, J. S., R. Keeney, and H. Raiffa, Smart Choices: a practical guide to making better decisions. 1999: Harvard Business School Press.
• 8: Keeney, R. and H. Raiffa, Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. 1976: Cambridge University Press.
• 9: Keeney, R. L., Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. 1992: Harvard University Press.
• 10: Kosslyn, S. M., Elements of Graph design. 1994.
• 11: Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and D. A. Schkade, Measuring Constructed Preference: Towards a Building Code. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999. 19(1): p. 243--270.
• 12: Pearl Pu , Boi Faltings, Enriching buyers' experiences: the SmartClient approach, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.289-296, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332446]
• 13: Ramana Rao , Stuart K. Card, The table lens: merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus + context visualization for tabular information, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.318-322, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191776]
• 14: Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1980, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 15: Spence, R. and L. Tweedie, The Attribute Explorer: information synthesis via exploration. Interacting with Computers, 1998. 11: p. 137--146.
• 16: Todd, P. and I. Benbasat, An Experimental investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision making Strategies. Information Systems Research, 1991. 2(2): p. 87--115.
• 17: Todd, P. and I. Benbasat, Inducing Compensatory Information Processing through Decision Aids that Facilitate Effort Reduction: An Experimental Assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000. 13: p. 91--106.
• 18: Christopher Williamson , Ben Shneiderman, The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploration system, Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.338-346, June 21-24, 1992, Copenhagen, Denmark [doi>10.1145/133160.133216]
• 19: Kent Wittenburg , Tom Lanning , Michael Heinrichs , Michael Stanton, Parallel bargrams for consumer-based information exploration and choice, Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, November 11-14, 2001, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/502348.502357]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.2 Types of Systems

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques

General Terms:
Design, Economics, Human Factors

Keywords:
decision analysis, evaluative index, information visualization, interactive techniques, linear model, preference model