Usability studies on a visualisation for parallel display and control of alternative scenarios

ABSTRACT

Many applications require comparison between alternative scenarios; most support it poorly. A subjunctive interface supports comparison through its facilities for parallel setup, viewing and control of scenarios. To evaluate the usability and benefits of these facilities, we ran experiments in which subjects used both a simple and a subjunctive interface to make comparisons in a census data set. In the first experiment, subjects reported higher satisfaction and lower workload with the subjunctive interface, and relied less on interim marks on paper. Subjects also used fewer interface actions. However, we found no reduction in task completion time, mainly because some subjects encountered problems in using the facilities for setting up and controlling scenarios. Based on a detailed analysis of subjects' actions we redesigned the subjunctive interface to alleviate frequent problems, such as accidentally adjusting only one scenario when the intention was to adjust them all. At the end of a second, five-session experiment, users of this redesigned interface completed tasks 27% more quickly than with the simple interface.

REFERENCES

• 1: Christopher Ahlberg , Ben Shneiderman, Visual information seeking: tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.313-317, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191775]
• 2: Michelle Q. Wang Baldonado , Allison Woodruff , Allan Kuchinsky, Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, p.110-119, May 2000, Palermo, Italy [doi>10.1145/345513.345271]
• 3: Stuart K. Card , Jock D. Mackinlay , Ben Shneiderman, Readings in information visualization: using vision to think, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1999
• 4: Ed Huai-hsin Chi , John Riedl , Phillip Barry , Joseph Konstan, Principles for Information Visualization Spreadsheets, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.18 n.4, p.30-38, July 1998 [doi>10.1109/38.689659]
• 5: John P. Chin , Virginia A. Diehl , Kent L. Norman, Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.213-218, May 15-19, 1988, Washington, D.C., United States [doi>10.1145/57167.57203]
• 6: Mark Derthick , Steven F. Roth, Data exploration across temporal contexts, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, p.60-67, January 09-12, 2000, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/325737.325782]
• 7: Hart S. G. and Staveland, L. E., Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock, P. A. and Meshkati, N. (eds.), Human Mental Workload. Elsevier, 1988, 139--183.
• 8: Hochheiser, H. and Shneiderman, B. Performance benefits of simultaneous over sequential menus as task complexity increases. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 2 (2000), 173--192.
• 9: Lunzer, A. Towards the subjunctive interface: general support for parameter exploration by overlaying alternative application states. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC. 13 international conference on human-computer interaction (INTERACT '99), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999, 474--482.
• 10: Lunzer, A. and Hornbæk, K. Side-by-side display and control of multiple scenarios: subjunctive interfaces for exploring multi-attribute data. In Proceedings of the Australian conference on computer-human interaction (OZCHI 2003), Brisbane, Australia, 2003, 202--210.
• 11: Mirel, B. Interaction Design for Complex Problem Solving. Developing Useful and Usable Software. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
• 12: Ramana Rao , Stuart K. Card, The table lens: merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus + context visualization for tabular information, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.318-322, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191776]
• 13: Roberts, J. C. Multiple-view and multiform visualization. In Proceedings of the SPIE conference on visual data exploration and analysis VII (IS&T/SPIE 2000), Proceedings of SPIE, 3960 (Jan. 2000), 176--185.
• 14: Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer, 16, 8 (Aug. 1983), 57--68.
• 15: Ben Shneiderman, Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002
• 16: Chris Stolte , Diane Tang , Pat Hanrahan, Polaris: A System for Query, Analysis, and Visualization of Multidimensional Relational Databases, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, v.8 n.1, p.52-65, January 2002 [doi>10.1109/2945.981851]
• 17: Michael Terry , Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Recognizing creative needs in user interface design, Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition, p.38-44, October 13-16, 2002, Loughborough, UK [doi>10.1145/581710.581718]
• 18: Michael Terry , Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Side views: persistent, on-demand previews for open-ended tasks, Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 27-30, 2002, Paris, France [doi>10.1145/571985.571996]
• 19: Tufte, E. Visual Explanations. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1997.
• 20: Lisa Tweedie , Robert Spence , Huw Dawkes , Hus Su, Externalising abstract mathematical models, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.406-ff., April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/238386.238587]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
information visualisation, iterative design and evaluation, subjunctive interfaces, usability study