ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
MADCOW: a multimedia digital annotation system
Full text PdfPdf (397 KB)
Source AVI archive
Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces table of contents
Gallipoli, Italy
SESSION: Improving interaction table of contents
Pages: 55 - 62  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-867-9
Authors
Paolo Bottoni  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Roberta Civica  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Stefano Levialdi  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Laura Orso  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Emanuele Panizzi  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Rosa Trinchese  Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Sponsors
: Regione Puglia
: Provincia di Lecce
: Comune di Corigliano d'Otranto
: Camera di Commercio di Brindisi
: Monte dei Paschi di Siena
: Università degli Studi di Bari
: Università degli Studi di Lecce
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
: Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/989863.989870
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Digital annotation of multimedia documents adds information to a document (e.g. a web page) or parts of it (a multimedia object such as an image or a video stream contained in the document). Digital annotations can be kept private or shared among different users over the internet, allowing discussions and cooperative work. We study the possibility of annotating multimedia documents with objects which are in turn of multimedial nature. Annotations can refer to whole documents or single portions thereof, as usual, but also to multi-objects, i.e. groups of objects contained in a single document. We designed and developed a new digital annotation system organized in a client-server architecture, where the client is a plug-in for a standard web browser and the servers are repositories of annotations to which different clients can login. Annotations can be retrieved and filtered, and one can choose different annotation servers for a document. We present a platform-independent design for such a system, and illustrate a specific implementation for Microsoft Internet Explorer on the client side and on JSP/MySQL for the server side.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Annotea. http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea.
 
2
Dublin core. http://dublincore.org.
 
3
Mpeg. http://www.mpeg.org.
 
4
Videoannex annotation tool. http://www.research.ibm.com/VideoAnnEx/.
 
5
Xpath. http://www.w3c.org/TR/xpath.
 
6
Xpointer. http://www.w3c.org/XML/Linking.
 
7
D. Bargeron, A. Gupta, J. Grudin, and E. Sanocki. Annotations for streaming video on the web: System design and usage studies. Technical report, Microsoft Research, 1999. http://research.microsoft.com/research/coet/MRAS/www8/paper.htm.
 
8
R. Bingler. Inote image annotation in java. Technical report, University of Virginia, 1998. http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/inote/.
 
9
F. Bonifazi, S. Levialdi, P. Rizzo, and R. Trinchese. A web-based annotation tool supporting e-learning. In Proc. AVI '02, pages 123--128. ACM Press, 2002.
 
10
P. Bottoni, S. Levialdi, and P. Rizzo. An analysis and case study of digital annotation. In N. Bianchi-Berthouze, editor, Proc. DNIS-2003, pages 216--230. Springer, 2003.
 
11
J. Brinkley, R. Jakobovits, and C. Rosse. An online image management system for anatomy teaching. In Proceedings of the AMIA 2002 Annual Symposium, 2002.
 
12
C. Chronaki, X. Zabulis, and S. Orphanoudakis. I2cnet medical image annotation service. In Med In-form (Lond), 1997.
13
 
14
W. Lober. Personal annotated image server (pais). Technical report, Washington University, 2000.
 
15
W. Lober and J. Brinkley. A portable image annotation tool for web-based anatomy atlases. In Proceedings of the AMIA 1999 Annual Symposium, 1999.
 
16
W. Lober and J. Brinkley. A personal annotated image server. Fellowship F38, LM00086, NLM, 2000.
 
17
W. Lober, L. Trigg, D. Bliss, and J. Brinkley. Iml: An image markup language. Fellowship F38, LM00086, NLM, 2000.
 
18
W. Mann and S. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, 1:1--21, 1987.
 
19
C. Roisin, T. Tran Thuong, and L. Villard. Integration of structured video in a multimedia authoring system. In Proc. of the Eurographics Multimedia'99 Workshop, pages 133--142. Springer Computer Science, 1999. http://opera.inrialpes.fr/people/Tien.Tran-Thuong/Welcome.html Demos and Publication section.
 
20
R. Schroeter, J. Hunter, and D. Kosovic. Vannotea - a collaborative video indexing, annotation and discussion system for broadband networks. In K-CAP 2003 Workshop on "Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation", 2003.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paolo Bottoni: colleagues
Roberta Civica: colleagues
Stefano Levialdi: colleagues
Laura Orso: colleagues
Emanuele Panizzi: colleagues
Rosa Trinchese: colleagues