A visual tool for tracing users' behavior in Virtual Environments

ABSTRACT

Although some guidelines (e.g., based on architectural principles) have been proposed for designing Virtual Environments (VEs), several usability problems can be identified only by studying the behavior of real users in VEs. This paper proposes a tool, called VU-Flow, that is able to automatically record usage data of VEs and then visualize it in formats that make it easy for the VE designer to visually detect peculiar users' behaviors and thus better understand the effects of her design choices. In particular, the visualizations concern: i) the detailed paths followed by single users or groups of users in the VE, ii) areas of maximum (or minimum) users' flow, iii) the parts of the environment more seen (or less seen) by users, iv) detailed replay of users visits. We show examples of how these visualizations allow one to visually detect useful information such as the interests of users, navigation problems, users' visiting style. Although this paper describes how VU-Flow can be used in the context of VEs, it is interesting to note that the tool can be also applied to the study of users of location-aware mobile devices in physical environments.

REFERENCES

• 1: Gregory D. Abowd , Anind K. Dey , Robert Orr , Jason Brotherton, Context-Awareness in Wearable and Ubiquitous Computing, Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, p.179, October 13-14, 1997
• 2: Bowman, D. 2002. Principles for the Design of Performance-oriented Interaction Techniques. In Stanney, K. (Ed.), Handbook of Virtual Environments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 277--300.
• 3: Byrne, R. 1983. Protocol Analysis in Problem Solving. In J. B. T. Evans (Ed.), Thinking and Reasoning: Psychological Approaches, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 227--249.
• 4: Charitos, D., Rutherford, P. 1996. Guidelines for the Design of Virtual Environments. Proc. VR-SIG'96, Leicester, UK.
• 5: COVEN. 1997. Usage Evaluation of the Initial Applications. Public Deliverable report of COVEN (Collaborative Virtual Environments) ACTS Project, http://coven.lancs.ac.uk/.
• 6: Darken, R. P., & Peterson, B. 2001. Spatial Orientation, Wayfinding, and Representation. In Stanney, K. (Ed.), Handbook of Virtual Environments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
• 7: Gabrielli, F., Marti, P., Petroni, L. 1999. The environment as interface. Proc. i3AC'99, Proceedings on-line (PDF) at http://www.i3net.org/cof, 44--47.
• 8: Helms, J., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L. and Carroll, J. M. 2000 Data Logging: Higher-Level Capturing and Multi-Level Abstracting of User Activities. Proc. HFES'00, ACM Press, New York, 303--306.
• 9: Andries van Dam , Kenneth Herndon , Michael Gleicher, The challenges of 3D interaction, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.469, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/259963.260500]
• 10: Lucio Ieronutti , Roberto Ranon , Luca Chittaro, Automatic derivation of electronic maps from X3D/VRML worlds, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technology, April 05-08, 2004, Monterey, California [doi>10.1145/985040.985049]
• 11: Jed Lengyel , Mark Reichert , Bruce R. Donald , Donald P. Greenberg, Real-time robot motion planning using rasterizing computer graphics hardware, Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.327-335, September 1990, Dallas, TX, USA
• 12: Mourouzis, A., Grammenos, D., Filou, M., Papadakos, P., Stephanidis, C. 2003. Virtual prints: An Empowering tool for Virtual Environments. Proc HCI'03, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 22--27.
• 13: Reinhard Oppermann , Marcus Specht, A Context-Sensitive Nomadic Exhibition Guide, Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, p.127-142, September 25-27, 2000, Bristol, UK
• 14: Laila Paganelli , Fabio Paternò, Intelligent analysis of user interactions with web applications, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 13-16, 2002, San Francisco, California, USA [doi>10.1145/502716.502735]
• 15: M. Sweeney , M. Maguire , B. Shackel, Evaluating user-computer interaction: a framework, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.38 n.4, p.689-711, April, 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1032]
• 16: Seth Teller , Jiawen Chen , Hari Balakrishnan, Pervasive Pose-Aware Applications and Infrastructure, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.23 n.4, p.14-18, July 2003 [doi>10.1109/MCG.2003.1210859]
• 17: Umiker-Sebeok, J. 1994. Behavior in a Museum: A Semio-Cognitive Approach to Museum Consumption Experiences. Signifying Behavior. Journal of Research in Semiotics, Communication Theory, and Cognitive Science, 1(1), 52--100.
• 18: Norman G. Vinson, Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.278-285, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303062]
• 19: Veron, E., Levasseur, M. 1983. Ethnographie de l'Exposition. Bibliothque publique d'Information, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Keywords:
evaluation tools, users' flow, virtual environments, virtual reality