ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Rate allocation in wireless sensor networks with network lifetime requirement
Full text PdfPdf (211 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Roppongi Hills, Tokyo, Japan
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 67 - 77  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-849-0
Authors
Y. Thomas Hou  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Yi Shi  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Hanif D. Sherali  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 105,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/989459.989469
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An important performance consideration for wireless sensor networks is the amount of information collected by all the nodes in the network over the course of network lifetime. Since the objective of maximizing the sum of rates of all the nodes in the network can lead to a severe bias in rate allocation among the nodes, we advocate the use of lexicographical max-min (LMM) rate allocation for the nodes. To calculate the LMM rate allocation vector, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm by exploiting the parametric analysis (PA) technique from linear programming (LP), which we call serial LP with Parametric Analysis (SLP-PA). We show that the SLP-PA can be also employed to address the so-called LMM node lifetime problem much more efficiently than an existing technique proposed in the literature. More important, we show that there exists an elegant duality relationship between the LMM rate allocation problem and the LMM node lifetime problem. Therefore, it is sufficient to solve any one of the two problems and important insights can be obtained by inferring duality results for the other problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
M. Bhardwaj and A.P. Chandrakasan, "Bounding the lifetime of sensor networks via optimal role assignments," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 1587--1596, June 23--27, 2002, New York, NY.
5
6
 
7
J.-H. Chang and L. Tassiulas, "Routing for maximum system lifetime in wireless ad-hoc networks," in Proc. 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, Sept. 1999, Monticello, IL.
 
8
J.-H. Chang and L. Tassiulas, "Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 22--31, March 26--30, 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel.
 
9
J. Chou, D. Petrovis, and K. Ramchandran, "A distributed and adaptive signal processing approach to reducing energy consumption in sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 1054--1062, April 1--3, 2003, San Francisco, CA.
 
10
 
11
Y.T. Hou, Y. Shi, and H.D. Sherali, "On rate allocation problem for wireless sensor networks," Technical Report, The Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, July 2003. Available at http://www.ece.vt.edu/ thou/Research.
 
12
K. Kar, M. Kodialam, T.V. Lakshman, and L. Tassiulas, "Routing for network capacity maximization in energy-constrained ad-hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 673--681, April 1--3, 2003, San Francisco, CA.
 
13
K. Kalpakis, K. Dasgupta, and P. Namjoshi, "Maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Networking (ICN'02), pp. 685--696, Aug. 26--29, 2002, Atlanta, GA.
 
14
H. Luss and D.R. Smith, "Resource allocation among competing activities: a lexicographic minimax approach," Operations Research Letters, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 227--231, Nov. 1986.
 
15
S.S. Pradhan, J. Kusuma, and K. Ramchandran, "Distributed compression in a dense sensor network," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 51--60, March 2002.
 
16
R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain, "Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 404--413, March 26--30, 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel.
 
17
K. Ramchandran, "Distributed sensor networks: opportunities and challenges in signal processing and communications," presentation at NSF Workshop on Distributed Communications and Signal Processing for Sensor Networks, Dec. 2002, Evanston, IL. Available at http://www.ece.northwestern.edu/ pappas/nsf_workshop/presentations/ramchandran_workshop_DDSP.ppt.
 
18
 
19
V. Rodoplu and T.H. Meng, "Minimum energy mobile wireless networks," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1333--1344, Aug. 1999.
 
20
V. Srinivasan, P. Nuggehalli, C.F. Chiasserini, and R. Rao, "Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 808--817, April 1--3, 2003, San Francisco, CA.
 
21
R. Wattenhofer, L. Li, P. Bahl, and Y.-M. Wang, "Distributed topology control for power efficient operation in multihop wireless ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 1388--1397, April 22--26, 2001, Anchorage, AK.
 
22
G. Zussman and A. Segall, "Energy efficient routing in ad hoc disaster recovery networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, pp. 405--421, April 1--3, 2003, San Francisco, CA.

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Y. Thomas Hou: colleagues
Yi Shi: colleagues
Hanif D. Sherali: colleagues