ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using labeled paths for loop-free on-demand routing in ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (304 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Roppongi Hills, Tokyo, Japan
SESSION: Routing and content distribution table of contents
Pages: 43 - 54  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-849-0
Authors
Hari Rangarajan  University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA
J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves  University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/989459.989466
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present the Feasible Label Routing (FLR) protocol for mobilead hoc networks, which uses path information to establish routes to destinations on demand. FLR enables loop-free incremental(hop-by-hop) routing of data packets using only the addresses of their destinations. Like the dynamic source routing (DSR) protocol, FLR avoids the need for any time-stamps or sequence numbers by the use of path vectors exchanged when routes are established or repaired. Instantaneous loop freedom is attained by using path information for a destination as labels with which routers are ordered lexicographically with respect to the destination, i.e., FLR ensures that the labels of routers for a given destination become "smaller" the closer they are to the destination. Simulation experiments in Qualnet show that the performance of FLR is far better than the performance of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) protocol, the dynamic source routing (DSR) protocol, and the optimized link state routing (OLSR) protocol, in terms of the packet delivery ratio and average delivery latencies achieved, as well as the overhead incurred in the network.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. Clausen and P. Jacquet, "Optimized Link State Routing Protocol," Request for Comments 3626, October 2003.
 
2
E. M. Gafni and D. P. Bertsekas, "Distributed Algorithms for Generating Loop-Free Routes in Networks with Frequently Changing Topology," IEEE Trans. Comm., COM-29(1):11--18, Jan. 1981.
 
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
D. Johnson et al, "The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR)," IETF Internet draft, draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt, April 2003.
 
8
R. Ogier et al., "Topology Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF)," Request for Comments 3684, February 2004.
 
9
10
 
11
C. Perkins et al., "Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing," Request for Comments 3561, July 2003.
 
12
C. Perkins et al. "Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks," IEEE Personal Communications, 8(1):16 -- 28, Feb 2001.
 
13
J. Raju and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, "A New Approach to On-Demand Loop-Free Multipath Routing," Proc. IEEE IC3N'99, pp. 522--7, Boston, Massachusetts, Oct. 11--13, 1999.
 
14
S. Roy and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, " Using Minimal Source Trees for On-Demand Routing in Ad Hoc Networks," Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, April 22-26, 2001.
 
15
C. Sengul, "Local Route Recovery in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," M.S. Thesis, Computer Science, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003.
16
17
 
18
Scalable Network Technologies. Qualnet 3.5.2.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Hari Rangarajan: colleagues
J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves: colleagues