ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Minimal period retiming under process variations
Full text PdfPdf (206 KB)
Source Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Poster Session 1 table of contents
Pages: 131 - 135  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-853-9
Authors
Jia Wang  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Hai Zhou  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 5,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/988952.988985
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

With aggressive scaling down of feature sizes in VLSI fabrication, process variations have become a critical issue in designs. With process variations, timing optimization should consider the randomness introduced in delays. This paper considers how to retime a circuit under process variations. A statistical retiming problem is defined on the concept of a disutility function. Based on a new minimal period retiming algorithm, two algorithms are presented for the statistical retiming problem. Both theoretical and experimental results are given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. E. Leiserson and J. B. Saxe. Optimization Synchronous Systems. Journal of VLSI and Computer Systems, 1:41--67, 1983.
 
2
C. E. Leiserson and J. B. Saxe. Retiming Synchronous Circuitry. Algorithmica, 6(1), 1991.
 
3
 
4
 
5
C. E. Clark. The Greatest of a Finite Set of Random Variables. Operational Research, Vol.9, No.2 (Mar.-Apr., 1961), 145--162.
 
6