ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Integrating analogical reasoning in a natural language understander
Full text PdfPdf (982 KB)
Source International conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Pages: 538 - 545  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-372-8
Authors
Stephanie E. August  Computer Science Department, 3436 BH, University of California, Los Angeles, California and Data Systems Division, Electro-Optical and Data Systems Group, Hughes Aircraft Company, El Segundo, CA
Lawrence P. McNamee  Computer Science Department, 3436 BH, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/98784.98881
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The research described in this paper addresses the problem of integrating analogical reasoning and argumentation into a natural language understanding system. We present an approach to completing an implicit argument-by-analogy as found in a natural language editorial text. The transformation of concepts from one domain to another, which is inherent in this task, is a complex process requiring basic reasoning skills and domain knowledge, as well as an understanding of the structure and use of both analogies and arguments. The integration of knowledge about natural language understanding, argumentation, and analogical reasoning is demonstrated in a proof of concept system called ARIEL. ARIEL is able to detect the presence of an analogy in an editorial text, identify the source and target components, and develop a conceptual representation of the completed analogy in memory. The design of our system is modular in nature, permitting extensions to the existing knowledge base and making the argumentation and analogical reasoning components portable to other understanding systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Alva89
 
Aren86
 
Augu85a
August, S. E., Dyer, M.G. Understanding analogies in editorials, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. University of California, Los Angeles, 18-23 August 1985.
 
Augu85b
August, S. E., Dyer, M.G. Analogy recognition and comprehension in editorials. In Proceedings of' the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. University of California, lxvine, 15-17 August 1985.
 
Carb83a
Carbonell, laime G. Learning by analogy: formulating and generalizing plans from past experience. In Michalski et al. (Eds.) Machine Learning, Tioga Publishing Co., Palo Alto, CA.
 
Carb83b
Carbonell, Jaime G. Derivational analogy and its role in problem solving. In Proceedings AAAI-83, 64-69.
 
Dyer83
 
Falk86
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., and Genmer, D. The structure-mapping engine. In Proceedings AAAI-86.
 
Flow82
Flowers, M., McOuire, R., and Birnbaum, L. Adversary arguments and the logic of pexsonal attacks. In Strategies for natural language processing, Wendy G. Lehnert and Martin H. Ringle, Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ.
 
Gent83
Genmer, Dedre. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7:155-170.
 
Holy89
Holyoak, Keith J., and Thagard, Paul. Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13:295-355.
 
Kolo87
Kolodner, Janet L. Capitalizing on failure through case-based inference. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Seattle WA, July 1987.
 
Norm75
Normari, Donald A., Rumelhart, D.E., and the LNR Research Group. Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, Freeman, 1975.
 
Rume76
Rumelhart, D. E., and Ortony, A. The representation of information in memory. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, and W.E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
 
Scha75
 
Shin88a
Shinn, H.S. Abstractional analogy: a model of analogical reasoning. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, May 1988.
 
Shin88b
Shinn, H.S. The role of mapping in analogical transfer. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
 
Turn87
Turner, Scott R., and Reeves, John F. Rhapsody user's guide. Technical Report UCLA-AI-87-3, University of California, Los Angeles.
 
Wins78
Winston, Patrick H. Learning by creating and justifying transfer frames. Artificial Intelligence, 10 (1978), 147-172.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephanie E. August: colleagues
Lawrence P. McNamee: colleagues