ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Location-based pairwise key establishments for static sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security of ad hoc and sensor networks table of contents
Fairfax, Virginia
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 72 - 82  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-783-4
Authors
Donggang Liu  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Peng Ning  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 100,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/986858.986869
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sensor networks are ideal candidates for applications such as target tracking and environment monitoring. Security in sensor networks is critical when there are potential adversaries. Establishment of pairwise keys is a fundamental security service, which forms the basis of other security services such as authentication and encryption. However, establishing pairwise keys in sensor networks is not a trivial task, particularly due to the resource constraints on sensors. This paper presents several techniques for establishing pairwise keys in static sensor networks. These techniques take advantage of the observation that in static sensor networks, although it is difficult to precisely pinpoint sensors' positions, it is often possible to approximately determine their locations. This paper presents a simple location-aware deployment model, and develops two pairwise key predistribution schemes, a closest pairwise keys predistribution scheme and a location-based pairwise keys scheme using bivariate polynomials, by taking advantage of sensors' expected locations. The analysis in this paper indicates that these schemes can achieve better performance if such location information is available and that the smaller the deployment error (i.e., the difference between a sensor's actual location and its expected location) is, the better performance they can achieve.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
D. W. Carman, P. S. Kruus, and B. J. Matt. Constrains and approaches for distributed sensor network security. Technical report, NAI Labs, 2000.
 
5
6
7
 
8
C. Karlof and David Wagner. Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: Attacks and countermeasures. In First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, May 2003.
 
9
D. Liu and P. Ning. Efficient distribution of key chain commitments for broadcast authentication in distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, pages 263--276, February 2003.
10
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
A. Perrig, R. Canetti, D. Song, and D. Tygar. Efficient and secure source authentication for multicast. In Proceedings of Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, February 2001.
 
15
A. Perrig, R. Canetti, D. Song, and D. Tygar. The tesla broadcast authentication protocol. In RSA Cryptobytes, 2002.
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
20

CITED BY  50