ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Random key-assignment for secure Wireless Sensor Networks
Full text PdfPdf (162 KB)
Source Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security of ad hoc and sensor networks table of contents
Fairfax, Virginia
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 62 - 71  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-783-4
Authors
Roberto Di Pietro  Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
Luigi V. Mancini  Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
Alessandro Mei  Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 155,   Citation Count: 29
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/986858.986868
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A distributed Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is a collection of n sensors with limited hardware resources. Sensors can exchange messages via Radio Frequency (RF), whose range usually covers only a limited number of other sensors. An interesting problem is how to implement secure pair-wise communications among any pair of sensors in a WSN. A WSN requires completely distributed solutions which are particularly challenging due to the limited resources and the size of the network. Moreover, WSNs can be subject to several security threats, including the physical compromising of a sensor. Hence, any solution for secure pairwise communications should tolerate the collusion of a set of corrupted sensors. This paper describes a probabilistic model and two protocols to establish a secure pair-wise communication channel between any pair of sensors in the WSN, by assigning a small set of random keys to each sensor. We build, based on the first Direct Protocol, a second Co-operative Protocol. The Co-operative Protocol is adaptive: its security properties can be dynamically changed during the life-time of the WSN. Both protocols also guarantee implicit and probabilistic mutual authentication without any additional overhead and without the presence of a base station. The performance of the Direct Protocol is analytically characterized while, for the Co-operative Protocol, we provide both analytical evaluations and extensive simulations. For example, the results show that, assuming each sensor stores 120 keys, in a WSN composed of 1024 sensors with 32 corrupted sensors the probability of a channel corruption is negligible in the case of the Co-operative Protocol.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Giuseppe Ateniese, Michael Steiner, and Gene Tsudik. New multiparty authentication services and key agreement protocols. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(4), 2000.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
D. W. Carman, P. S. Kruus, and B. J. Matt. Constraints and approaches for distributed sensor network security. Technical Report #00-010, NAI Labs, 2000.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Whitfield Diffie and Martin E. Hellman. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-22(6):644--654, 1976.
10
 
11
A. D. Amis et al. Max-min d-cluster formation in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM 2000, pages 32--41, 2000.
 
12
John Haigh. Probabilty Models. Springer, 2002. ISBN 1-85233-431-2.
13
14
15
16
 
17
NIST. Fips pub 140-1, security requirements for cryptographic modules. National Institute of Standard and Technology, January 1994.
 
18
Charles E. Perkins. Ad Hoc Networking. Addison Wesley Professional, 2001. ISBN 0-201-30976-9.
19
20
 
21
E. M. Royer and C-K Toh. A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless network. In IEEE Personal Communication Magazine, pages 46--55, April 1999.
 
22
 
23
24
 
25

CITED BY  30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roberto Di Pietro: colleagues
Luigi V. Mancini: colleagues
Alessandro Mei: colleagues