ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Securing nomads: the case for quarantine, examination, and decontamination
Full text PdfPdf (693 KB)
Source New Security Paradigms Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 2003 workshop on New security paradigms table of contents
Ascona, Switzerland
SESSION: Ubiquitous computing/security table of contents
Pages: 123 - 128  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-880-6
Authors
Kevin Eustice  Corporation, El Segundo, CA
Leonard Kleinrock  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Shane Markstrum  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Gerald Popek  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
V. Ramakrishna  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Peter Reiher  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
: Applied Computer Security Associates (ACSA)
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/986655.986673
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The rapid growth and increasing pervasiveness of wireless networks raises serious security concerns. Client devices will migrate between numerous diverse wireless environments, bringing with them software vulnerabilities and possibly malicious code. Techniques are needed to protect wireless client devices and the next generation wireless infrastructure. We propose QED, a new security model for wireless networks that enables wireless environments to quarantine devices and then analyze and potentially update or "decontaminate" client nodes. The QED paradigm is presented here, as well as the design of a practical prototype.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Balasubramaniyan, J. Garcia-Fernandez, E. Spafford, D. Zamboni. An Architecture for Intrusion Detection using Autonomous Agents., COAST Technical Report 98/05, 1998.
 
2
Extensible Authentication Protocol - RFC 2284 - http://www.ietf, org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eap-rfc2284bis-01.txt
3
 
4
Iptables : http://www.netfilter.org/
 
5
 
6
Nam Nguyen, Peter Reiher, Geoff Kuenning, Detecting Insider Threats by Monitoring System Call Activity. Submitted to 4th Annual IEEE Information Assurance, West Point, New York, Mar 2003.
 
7
Nmap Network Mapper. http://www.insecure.org/nmap/
 
8
The Open Group's Common Data SecurityArchitecture(CDSA). http://www.opengroup.org/security/12-cdsa.htm
 
9
Paul Roberts. Hackers find way to exploit latest Microsoft hole. IDG News Service, Sept. 16, 2003. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/09/16/HNhackers_l.html
 
10
Steven R. Snapp et al. DIDS (Distributed Intrusion Detection System) -Motivation, Architecture, and An Early Prototype. Proc. 14th National Computer Security Conference. Washington, DC, Oct. 1991, pp. 167176.
 
11
S. Staniford-Chen, S. Cheung, R. Crawford, M. Dilger, J. Frank, J. Hoagland, K. Levitt, C. Wee, R. Yip, D. Zerkle. GrIDS - A Graph Based Intrusion Detection System for Large Networks, in Proc. of the 19th National Information Systems Security Conference. Baltimore, MD, Oct. 1996, 361--370.
 
12
The Trusted Computing Platform Alliance http://www.trustedpc.org
 
13
W. Venema, W. and D. Farmer. Improving the Security of Your Site by Breaking Into It. 1993 Internet White paper. http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/infosys/security/wietse-archive/admin-guide-to-cracking. 101.Z


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kevin Eustice: colleagues
Leonard Kleinrock: colleagues
Shane Markstrum: colleagues
Gerald Popek: colleagues
V. Ramakrishna: colleagues
Peter Reiher: colleagues