Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

Previously, we defined robust and easy-to-calculate error metrics for text entry research. Herein, we announce a software implementation of this error analysis technique. We build on previous work, by introducing two new metrics, and we extend error rate analyses to high key-stroke-per-character entry techniques, such as Multi-Tap.

REFERENCES

• 1: Stuart K. Card , Thomas P. Moran , Allen Newell, The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems, Communications of the ACM, v.23 n.7, p.396-410, July 1980 [doi>10.1145/358886.358895]
• 2: eTForecasts, http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ ES_pdas2003.htm (June, 2003)
• 3: GSM World. http://www.gsmworld.com/news /statistics/index.shtml (2003)
• 4: MacKenzie, I. S. Introduction to this special issue on text entry for mobile computing. Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2002). 17, 141--145.
• 5: I. Scott MacKenzie, KSPC (Keystrokes per Character) as a Characteristic of Text Entry Techniques, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction, p.195-210, September 18-20, 2002
• 6: I. Scott MacKenzie , R. William Soukoreff, A character-level error analysis technique for evaluating text entry methods, Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, October 19-23, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark [doi>10.1145/572020.572056]
• 7: MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2002). 17, 147--198.
• 8: I. Scott MacKenzie , R. William Soukoreff, Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques, CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/765891.765971]
• 9: Pavlovych, A., & Stuerzlinger, W. Less-Tap: A fast and easy-to-learn text input technique for phones, Proceedings of Graphics Interface - GI 2003. Canadian Information Processing Society (2003). 97--104.
• 10: R. William Soukoreff , I. Scott MacKenzie, Measuring errors in text entry tasks: an application of the Levenshtein string distance statistic, CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, March 31-April 05, 2001, Seattle, Washington [doi>10.1145/634067.634256]
• 11: R. William Soukoreff , I. Scott MacKenzie, Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642632]
• 12: Soukoreff, R. W., & MacKenzie, I. S. Input-based language modelling in the design of high performance input systems. Proceedings of Graphics Interface - GI 2003. Canadian Information Processing Society (2003). 89--96.
• 13: Wobbrock, Jacob O. Personal correspondence. (2003)
• 14: Yamada, H. A historical study of typewriters and typing methods, from the position of planning Japanese parallels. Journal of Information Processing. Information Processing Society of Japan (1980). 2(4),175--202.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Keywords:
error rate, minimum string distance, text entry