ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking
Full text PdfPdf (359 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
SESSION: Late breaking result papers table of contents
Pages: 1243 - 1246  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-703-6
Authors
Terhi Mustonen  Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
Maria Olkkonen  Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
Jukka Hakkinen  Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 64,   Downloads (12 Months): 123,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986034
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this study, alternative methods for studying legibility of text while walking with a mobile phone were examined. Normal reading and pseudo-text search were used as visual tasks in four walking conditions. Visual performance and subjective evaluation of task difficulty were used as measures of text legibility. According to the results, visual performance suffers from increasing walking speed, and the effects are greater on reading velocity for pseudo-text search. Subjects also use more homogenous strategies when reading compared to pseudo-text search, and therefore it is concluded that reading is a more useful measure of legibility. Subjective measures are found to be more sensitive to small variations in legibility than objective measures, and give additional information about task demands. Hence, without both objective and subjective measurements important information about legibility in different conditions and with different tasks will be lost.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Griffin, M. J. Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press, London (1990).
 
2
Hillman, E. J., Bloomberg, J. J., McDonald, P. V. & Cohen, H. S. Dynamic visual acuity while walking in normals and labyrinthine-deficient patients. Journal of Vestibular Research, 9 (1999), 49--57.
 
3
Roufs, J. A. J. and Boschmann, M. C. Text quality metrics for visual display units: I. Methodological aspects. Displays, 18 (1997), 37--43.
 
4
Bouma, H. Visual reading processes and the quality of text displays. In: E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (eds.), Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals, 101--114. Proc. Int. Workshop, Milan (1980).
 
5
ISO 9241-3:1992 Ergonomic requirements for office work with display terminals (VDTs), Part 3: Visual display requirements, Amendment 1: Annex C (normative): Visual performance and comfort test.
 
6
Boschmann, M. C. and Roufs, J. A. J. Text quality metrics for visual display units: II. An experimental survey. Displays, 18 (1997), 45--64.
 
7
Griffin M. J. & Hayward, R. A. Effects of horizontal whole-body vibration on reading. Applied Ergonomics, 25 (1994), 165--169.
 
8
NASA TLX subjective workload assessment scale: <http://iac.dtic.mil/hsiac/docs/TLX-UserManual.pdf>

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Terhi Mustonen: colleagues
Maria Olkkonen: colleagues
Jukka Hakkinen: colleagues